Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37553349›Full record

ArticleScientific data2023

MedalCare-XL: 16,900 healthy and pathological synthetic 12 lead ECGs from electrophysiological simulations.

Karli Gillette, Matthias A F Gsell, Claudia Nagel, Jule Bender, Benjamin Winkler, Steven E Williams, Markus Bär, Tobias Schäffter, Olaf Dössel, Gernot Plank and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Computational modelling of biological systems now and then: revisiting tools and visions from the beginning of the century.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Karli Gillette *Gottfried Schatz Research Center: Division of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Matthias A F Gsell *Gottfried Schatz Research Center: Division of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7742-8193
Claudia Nagel *Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Jule BenderInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7013-4344
Benjamin WinklerPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, National Metrology Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Steven E WilliamsKing's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Markus BärPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, National Metrology Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Tobias SchäffterPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, National Metrology Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1310-2631
Olaf Dössel *Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Gernot Plank *Gottfried Schatz Research Center: Division of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. gernot.plank@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7380-6908
Axel Loewe *Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany. publications@ibt.kit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2487-4744
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology · DEMedical University of Graz · ATPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt · DEKing's College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation (BHF) FS/20/26/34952 and RE/18/5/34216EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 18HLT07EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) MedalCare 18HLT07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanistic cardiac electrophysiology models allow for personalized simulations of the electrical activity in the heart and the ensuing electrocardiogram (ECG) on the body surface. As such, synthetic signals possess known ground truth labels of the underlying disease and can be employed for validation of machine learning ECG analysis tools in addition to clinical signals. Recently, synthetic ECGs were used to enrich sparse clinical data or even replace them completely during training leading to improved performance on real-world clinical test data. We thus generated a novel synthetic database comprising a total of 16,900 12 lead ECGs based on electrophysiological simulations equally distributed into healthy control and 7 pathology classes. The pathological case of myocardial infraction had 6 sub-classes. A comparison of extracted features between the virtual cohort and a publicly available clinical ECG database demonstrated that the synthetic signals represent clinical ECGs for healthy and pathological subpopulations with high fidelity. The ECG database is split into training, validation, and test folds for development and objective assessment of novel machine learning algorithms.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyHeartAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningMyocardium

Identifiers

PMID37553349
PMCPMC10409805
OpenAlexW4385665904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.