Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37553336›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Nutritional and host environments determine community ecology and keystone species in a synthetic gut bacterial community.

Anna S Weiss, Lisa S Niedermeier, Alexandra von Strempel, Anna G Burrichter, Diana Ring, Chen Meng, Karin Kleigrewe, Chiara Lincetto, Johannes Hübner, Bärbel Stecher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The OMMGut microbes · 2026
    Review
  2. From predicted bacteriocins to ecological function.Current research in microbial sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Interspecies interaction controlsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Therapeutic potential ofMicrobiome research reports · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna S WeissMax von Pettenkofer Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8042-2411
Lisa S NiedermeierMax von Pettenkofer Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexandra von StrempelMax von Pettenkofer Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Anna G BurrichterMax von Pettenkofer Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Diana RingMax von Pettenkofer Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Chen MengBavarian Center for Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Karin KleigreweBavarian Center for Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7718-0252
Chiara LincettoDivision of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Johannes HübnerDivision of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1232-4646
Bärbel StecherMax von Pettenkofer Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. stecher@mvp.lmu.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A challenging task to understand health and disease-related microbiome signatures is to move beyond descriptive community-level profiling towards disentangling microbial interaction networks. Using a synthetic gut bacterial community, we aimed to study the role of individual members in community assembly, identify putative keystone species and test their influence across different environments. Single-species dropout experiments reveal that bacterial strain relationships strongly vary not only in different regions of the murine gut, but also across several standard culture media. Mechanisms involved in environment-dependent keystone functions in vitro include exclusive access to polysaccharides as well as bacteriocin production. Further, Bacteroides caecimuris and Blautia coccoides are found to play keystone roles in gnotobiotic mice by impacting community composition, the metabolic landscape and inflammatory responses. In summary, the presented study highlights the strong interdependency between bacterial community ecology and the biotic and abiotic environment. These results question the concept of universally valid keystone species in the gastrointestinal ecosystem and underline the context-dependency of both, keystone functions and bacterial interaction networks.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaEcologyGastrointestinal TractMiceMicrobial Interactions

Identifiers

PMID37553336
PMCPMC10409746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.