Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37553274›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2023

Videos of simulated after action reviews: a training resource to support social and inclusive learning from patient safety events.

Siobhán E McCarthy, Catherine Hogan, Loretta Jenkins, Lorraine Schwanberg, David J Williams, Lisa Mellon, Aisling Walsh, Theresa Keane, Natasha Rafter

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Siobhán E McCarthyGraduate School of Healthcare Management, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland smccarthy@rcsi.ie.ORCID 0000-0001-5651-2409
Catherine HoganNational Quality and Patient Safety Directorate, Office of the Chief Clinical Officer, Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
Loretta JenkinsNational Quality and Patient Safety Directorate, Office of the Chief Clinical Officer, Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
Lorraine SchwanbergNational Quality and Patient Safety Directorate, Office of the Chief Clinical Officer, Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
David J WilliamsDepartment of Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Lisa MellonDepartment of Health Psychology, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Aisling WalshDepartment of Public Health & Epidemiology, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5312-5101
Theresa KeaneGraduate School of Healthcare Management, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Natasha RafterDepartment of Public Health & Epidemiology, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0486-3076

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovation in the education and training of healthcare staff is required to support complementary approaches to learning from patient safety and everyday events in healthcare. Debriefing is a commonly used learning tool in healthcare education but not in clinical practice. Little is known about how to implement debriefing as an approach to safety learning across a health system. After action review (AAR) is a debriefing approach designed to help groups come to a shared mental model about what happened, why it happened and to identify learning and improvement. This paper describes a digital-based implementation strategy adapted to the Irish healthcare system to promote AAR uptake. The digital strategy aims to assist implementation of national level incident management policies and was collaboratively developed by the RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences and the National Quality and Patient Safety Directorate of the Health Service Executive. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a well-established in-person AAR training programme was disrupted and this led to the development of a series of open access videos on AAR facilitation skills (which accompany the online version of this paper). These provide: (1) an introduction to the AAR facilitation process; (2) a simulation of a facilitated formal AAR; (3) techniques for handling challenging situations that may arise in an AAR and a (4) reflection on the benefits of the AAR process. These have the potential to be used widely to support learning from patient safety and everyday events including excellent care.

Indexed as

COVID-19Patient SafetyClinical CompetenceDelivery of Health CareHumansPandemicsHand-offMedical educationPatient safetySimulationTeamwork

Identifiers

PMID37553274
PMCPMC10414102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.