Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37553196›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2023

Results of the Meso-ORIGINS feasibility study regarding collection of matched benign-mesothelioma tissue pairs by longitudinal surveillance.

Katie Ferguson, Matthew Neilson, Rachel Mercer, Jenny King, Kelly Marshall, Hugh Welch, Selina Tsim, Nick A Maskell, Najib M Rahman, Matthew Evison and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Katie FergusonGlasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Campus, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9308-6875
Matthew NeilsonThe Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, UK.
Rachel MercerOxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Jenny KingDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kelly MarshallDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Hugh WelchAcademic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Selina TsimGlasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Campus, Glasgow, UK.
Nick A MaskellUniversity of Bristol Academic Respiratory Unit, Westbury on Trym, UK.
Najib M RahmanOxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Matthew EvisonDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kevin G BlythGlasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Campus, Glasgow, UK Kevin.Blyth@glasgow.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 29372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess key elements of the design for Meso-ORIGINS (Mesothelioma Observational study of RIsk prediction and Generation of paired benign-meso tissue samples, Including a Nested MRI Substudy), an ambitious, UK-wide, prospective study that will collect ≥63 matched benign-mesothelioma tissue pairs through longitudinal surveillance and repeat biopsy of patients with asbestos-associated pleural inflammation (AAPI).

designA multicentre, mixed-methods feasibility study, comprising a prospective observational element, evaluating recruitment feasibility, technical feasibility of repeat local anaesthetic thoracoscopy (LAT) and patient acceptability, and a retrospective cohort study focused on AAPI-mesothelioma evolution rate, informing sample size.

setting4 UK pleural disease centres (February 2019-January 2020).

participantsPatients with AAPI (history or typical imaging plus appropriate pleural histology) were eligible for both elements. In August 2019, eligibility for the prospective element was broadened, including addition of radiological AAPI for technical feasibility and patient acceptability endpoints only. Retrospective cases required ≥2 years follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: A prospective recruitment target was set a priori at 27 histological AAPI cases (or 14 in any 6 months). Technical feasibility and patient acceptability were determined at 6-month follow-up by thoracic ultrasound surrogates and questionnaires, respectively. Retrospective malignant pleural mesothelioma evolution rate was defined by proportion (95% CI). Baseline predictors of evolution were identified using logistic regression.

results296 patients with AAPI (39 prospective, 257 retrospective) were recruited/selected. 21/39 prospective recruits were histologically diagnosed (target n=27). Repeat LAT was technically feasible and acceptable in 13/28 (46%) and 24/36 (67%) cases with complete follow-up data. Mesothelioma evolution was confirmed histologically in 36/257 retrospective cases (14% (95% CI 10.3% to 18.8%)) and associated with malignant CT features (OR 4.78 (95% CI 2.36 to 9.86)) and age (OR 1.06 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.12)).

conclusionsOur initial eligibility criteria were too narrow. Meso-ORIGINS will recruit a broader cohort, including prevalent cases, any biopsy type and patients with malignant CT features. A range of rebiopsy techniques will be allowed, accounting for technical and patient factors. The sample size has been reduced to 500. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12840870.

Indexed as

AsbestosLung NeoplasmsMesotheliomaMesothelioma, MalignantPleural NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesAsbestosoncologyrespiratory medicine (see thoracic medicine)respiratory tract tumoursthoracic medicine

Identifiers

PMID37553196
PMCPMC10414089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.