Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37553142›Full record

ArticleNephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association2024

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography reveals a lower cortical perfusion and a decreased renal flow reserve in hypertensive patients.

Aikaterini Damianaki, Mariëlle Hendriks-Balk, Wendy Brito, Erietta Polychronopoulou, Kenji Theiler, Marc Maillard, Jonathan Maurer, Philippe Eugster, Menno Pruijm, Grégoire Wuerzner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aikaterini DamianakiService of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2815-3650
Mariëlle Hendriks-BalkService of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9454-9605
Wendy BritoService of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Erietta PolychronopoulouService of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8355-3908
Kenji TheilerService of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marc MaillardService of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6428-0046
Jonathan MaurerService of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Philippe EugsterService of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0197-6318
Menno PruijmService of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1027-1851
Grégoire WuerznerService of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6424-7630
University of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 320030_179 379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrovascular structural alteration and dysfunction is a hallmark of arterial hypertension. So far, the visualization and the quantification of renal microcirculation in humans has been hampered by the lack of non-nephrotoxic and non-invasive radiologic techniques. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is an appealing method to investigate renal microcirculation and has not been investigated in this setting. We aimed to compare renal microcirculation in normotensive (NT) and hypertensive (HT) participants using CEUS at rest and during a sympathetic stress test.

methodsWe measured the renal perfusion index (PI, primary outcome), the renal resistive index (RRI), beat-to-beat systemic hemodynamics and plasma catecholamines before and during a 2-min cold pressor test (CPT) in NT and HT participants. Linear mixed model analysis was used to compare the effect of the CPT on the variables of interest.

resultsSeventy-three participants (32 HT) with normal kidney function were included. HT participants had a lower baseline PI compared with NT participants [median (interquartile range) 1476 (959-2155) arbitrary units (a.u.) vs 2062 (1438-3318) a.u., P < .001]. The CPT increased blood pressure, heart rate and catecholamines in all participants. The increase in PI observed in NT during the CPT was blunted in HT [+504 (117-920) a.u. vs +1159 (678-2352) a.u in NT, interaction P = .013]. Age, sex and body mass index did not modify these results.

conclusionsHT patients had a lower basal renal cortical perfusion. During the cold pressor test, HT participants had a smaller increase in the PI, suggesting that renal cortical flow reserve is impaired.

Indexed as

HypertensionKidneyCatecholaminesHumansPerfusionUltrasonographyCatecholaminescold pressor testcontrast-enhanced ultrasoundhypertensionrenal perfusionrenal resistive index

Identifiers

PMID37553142
PMCPMC10828216
OpenAlexW4385647944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.