ArticleHealth services research2024
Rural/urban differences in rates and predictors of intimate partner violence and abuse screening among pregnant and postpartum United States residents.
Article in Health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Domestic Violence Among Pregnant Women in Rural and Urban Areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Timing of intimate partner violence and alcohol and cigarette use across the perinatal period among American Indian and Alaska Native women.Harm reduction journal · 2026Article
- Navigating Violence: Understanding Intimate Partner Violence in Saskatchewan's 2SLGBTQ+ Women.Violence against women · 2026Article
- Differences in intimate partner violence screening preconception to postpartum for US-born versus foreign-born birthing people.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Sociodemographic Characteristics Associated with Lifetime and Recent Traumatic Experiences Among People Living with HIV in Florida.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a New Rural Maternity Care Center Amid Nationwide Closures.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Association of adverse pregnancy outcomes and intimate partner violence survivorship: a cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- The magnitude and risk factors of intimate partner violence during pregnancy in rural Tanzanian communities: an analytical cross-sectional study.Journal of rural medicine : JRM · 2025Article
- Rural/urban differences in rates and predictors of intimate partner violence and abuse screening among pregnant and postpartum United States residents.Health services research · 2024Article
- Intimate Partner Homicide Among Women of Childbearing Age: Identifying Multilevel Risk Factors with Machine Learning.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- Assessing Crisis Pregnancy Centers' Capacity for Supporting Perinatal Clients with Social Complexity in Rural Maternal Health Care Shortage Areas.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo describe rates and predictors of perinatal intimate partner violence (IPV) and rates and predictors of not being screened for abuse among rural and urban IPV victims who gave birth. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY
settingThis analysis utilized 2016-2020 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data from 45 states and three jurisdictions. STUDY
designThis is a retrospective, cross-sectional study using multistate survey data. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
methodsThis analysis included 201,413 survey respondents who gave birth in 2016-2020 (n = 42,193 rural and 159,220 urban respondents). We used survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression models, stratified by rural/urban residence, to estimate adjusted predicted probabilities and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for two outcomes: (1) self-reported experiences of IPV (physical violence by a current or former intimate partner) and (2) not receiving abuse screening at health care visits before, during, or after pregnancy. PRINCIPAL
findingsRural residents had a higher prevalence of perinatal IPV (4.6%) than urban residents (3.2%). Rural respondents who were Medicaid beneficiaries, 18-35 years old, non-Hispanic white, Hispanic (English-speaking), or American Indian/Alaska Native had significantly higher predicted probabilities of experiencing perinatal IPV compared with their urban counterparts. Among respondents who experienced perinatal IPV, predicted probabilities of not receiving abuse screening were 21.3% for rural and 16.5% for urban residents. Predicted probabilities of not being screened for abuse were elevated for rural IPV victims who were Medicaid beneficiaries, 18-24 years old, or unmarried, compared to urban IPV victims with those same characteristics.
conclusionsIPV is more common among rural birthing people, and rural IPV victims are at higher risk of not being screened for abuse compared with their urban peers. IPV prevention and support interventions are needed in rural communities and should focus on universal abuse screening during health care visits and targeted support for those at greatest risk of perinatal IPV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.