Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37552932›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2023

Inferring the Direction of Introgression Using Genomic Sequence Data.

Yuttapong Thawornwattana, Jun Huang, Tomáš Flouri, James Mallet, Ziheng Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The power of coalescent methods for inferring recent and ancient gene flow in endangered Bactrian camels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuttapong ThawornwattanaDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2745-163X
Jun HuangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-4196-9729
Tomáš FlouriDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8474-9507
James MalletDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3370-0367
Ziheng YangDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3351-7981

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R01356X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic data are informative about the history of species divergence and interspecific gene flow, including the direction, timing, and strength of gene flow. However, gene flow in opposite directions generates similar patterns in multilocus sequence data, such as reduced sequence divergence between the hybridizing species. As a result, inference of the direction of gene flow is challenging. Here, we investigate the information about the direction of gene flow present in genomic sequence data using likelihood-based methods under the multispecies-coalescent-with-introgression model. We analyze the case of two species, and use simulation to examine cases with three or four species. We find that it is easier to infer gene flow from a small population to a large one than in the opposite direction, and easier to infer inflow (gene flow from outgroup species to an ingroup species) than outflow (gene flow from an ingroup species to an outgroup species). It is also easier to infer gene flow if there is a longer time of separate evolution between the initial divergence and subsequent introgression. When introgression is assumed to occur in the wrong direction, the time of introgression tends to be correctly estimated and the Bayesian test of gene flow is often significant, while estimates of introgression probability can be even greater than the true probability. We analyze genomic sequences from Heliconius butterflies to demonstrate that typical genomic datasets are informative about the direction of interspecific gene flow, as well as its timing and strength.

Indexed as

ButterfliesAnimalsBayes TheoremGene FlowGenomeGenomicsHybridization, GeneticLikelihood FunctionsPhylogenyBppdirection of gene flowgene flowintrogressionmultispecies coalescent

Identifiers

PMID37552932
PMCPMC10439365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.