ReviewMolecular biology and evolution2023
Major Revisions in Pancrustacean Phylogeny and Evidence of Sensitivity to Taxon Sampling.
Review in Molecular biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molting in Pancrustacea Is Characterized by Both Deeply Conserved and Recently Evolved Gene Modules.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Phylogenomics supports monophyly of marsupial crustaceans: a journey to direct development.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Evolutionary History of the α-Carbonic Anhydrase Gene Family in the Phylum Arthropoda, With Comparisons to αCA in Chordates.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Mitogenomic phylogeny of the aquatic subterranean Bathynellacea (Crustacea, Malacostraca) and implications for the monophyly of Syncarida.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Pervasive convergent evolution of sperm conjugation across the Arthropoda tree of life.Nature communications · 2026Review
- The dynamic evolution of panarthropod germ cell specification mechanisms.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- Imagin: An Integrase-Like Gene Conserved Across Malacostracan Crustaceans Derived From a Ginger1 DNA Transposon.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Reduction of body segmentation in the skeleton shrimp Caprella scaura (Amphipoda: Caprellidae) inferred from comparative internal anatomy of Caprelloidea.Die Naturwissenschaften · 2026Article
- Evolution of environmental sex determination via juvenile hormone-induced gene co-option inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Article
- The sensory gene repertoire of deep-sea hydrothermal shrimp.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Extended taxon sampling reveals conflicting mitochondrial phylogenomics in the holarctic Reticulitermes termites (Blattodea: Termitoidae).Journal of insect science (Online) · 2025Article
- Brain anatomy of the Cambrian fossil Jianfengia multisegmentalis informs euarthropod phylogeny.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Glandular quinoline-derivates protect crustacean woodlice from spider predation.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- PhyloTune: An efficient method to accelerate phylogenetic updates using a pretrained DNA language model.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A new morphological phylogeny of Malacostraca comparing the application of character dependencies and implied weighting.Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society · 2025Article
- Coevolution ofiScience · 2025Article
- Gregarious behaviour in Carboniferous cyclidan crustaceans.Biology letters · 2025Article
- The Complete Larval Development of the Pedunculated BarnacleZoological studies · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clade Pancrustacea, comprising crustaceans and hexapods, is the most diverse group of animals on earth, containing over 80% of animal species and half of animal biomass. It has been the subject of several recent phylogenomic analyses, yet relationships within Pancrustacea show a notable lack of stability. Here, the phylogeny is estimated with expanded taxon sampling, particularly of malacostracans. We show small changes in taxon sampling have large impacts on phylogenetic estimation. By analyzing identical orthologs between two slightly different taxon sets, we show that the differences in the resulting topologies are due primarily to the effects of taxon sampling on the phylogenetic reconstruction method. We compare trees resulting from our phylogenomic analyses with those from the literature to explore the large tree space of pancrustacean phylogenetic hypotheses and find that statistical topology tests reject the previously published trees in favor of the maximum likelihood trees produced here. Our results reject several clades including Caridoida, Eucarida, Multicrustacea, Vericrustacea, and Syncarida. Notably, we find Copepoda nested within Allotriocarida with high support and recover a novel relationship between decapods, euphausiids, and syncarids that we refer to as the Syneucarida. With denser taxon sampling, we find Stomatopoda sister to this latter clade, which we collectively name Stomatocarida, dividing Malacostraca into three clades: Leptostraca, Peracarida, and Stomatocarida. A new Bayesian divergence time estimation is conducted using 13 vetted fossils. We review our results in the context of other pancrustacean phylogenetic hypotheses and highlight 15 key taxa to sample in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.