Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37552524›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2023

New microbial tools to boost restoration and soil organic matter.

Tadeo Sáez-Sandino, Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo, Eleonora Egidi, Brajesh K Singh

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Invasion timing affects multiple scales, metrics, and facets of biodiversity outcomes in ecological restoration experiments.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How are microbes helping end hunger?Microbial biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tadeo Sáez-SandinoDepartamento de Sistemas Físicos, Químicos y Naturales, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9539-4716
Manuel Delgado-BaquerizoLaboratorio de Biodiversidad y Funcionamiento Ecosistémico, Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla (IRNAS), CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.
Eleonora EgidiHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
Brajesh K SinghHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4413-4185

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic activities are causing unprecedented rates of soil and ecosystem degradation, and the current restoration practices take decades and are prone to high rates of failure. Here we propose, the development and application of emerging microbiome tools that can potentially improve the contents and diversity of soil organic matters, enhancing the efficacy and consistency of restoration outcomes.

Indexed as

EcosystemMicrobiotaCarbonSoilSoil MicrobiologyCarbonSoil

Identifiers

PMID37552524
PMCPMC10616644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.