Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37552479›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Radiation Facility Volume and Survival for Men With Very High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radiation and Androgen Deprivation Therapy.

Nikhil Sebastian, Subir Goyal, Yuan Liu, James R Janopaul-Naylor, Pretesh R Patel, Vishal R Dhere, Sheela Hanasoge, Jay W Shelton, Karen D Godette, Ashesh B Jani and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nikhil SebastianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Subir GoyalBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Yuan LiuBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
James R Janopaul-NaylorDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Pretesh R PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Vishal R DhereDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Sheela HanasogeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jay W SheltonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Karen D GodetteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ashesh B JaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Bruce HershatterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Benjamin Fischer-ValuckRadiation Oncology at Swedish, Englewood, Colorado.
Sagar A PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Suresh S Ramalingam · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
Emory Clinical Oncology Career Development Award K12 ProgramK12CA237806 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DHODAPKAR, KAVITA MADHAV, RAMALINGAM, SURESH S · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA237806NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Very high-risk (VHR) prostate cancer is an aggressive substratum of high-risk prostate cancer, characterized by high prostate-specific antigen levels, high Gleason score, and/or advanced T category. Contemporary management paradigms involve advanced molecular imaging and multimodal treatment with intensified prostate-directed or systemic treatment-resources more readily available at high-volume centers. Objective: To examine radiation facility case volume and overall survival (OS) in men with VHR prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was performed from November 11, 2022, to March 4, 2023, analyzing data from US facilities reporting to the National Cancer Database. Patients included men diagnosed with nonmetastatic VHR prostate cancer by National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria (clinical T3b-T4 category, primary Gleason pattern 5, >4 cores with grade group 4-5, and/or 2-3 high-risk features) and treated with curative-intent radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy between January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2016. Exposures: Treatment at high- vs low-average cumulative facility volume (ACFV), defined as the total number of prostate radiotherapy cases at an individual patient's treatment facility from 2004 until the year of their diagnosis. The nonlinear association between a continuous ACFV and OS was examined through a Martingale residual plot; an optimal ACFV cutoff was identified that maximized the separation between high vs low ACFV via a bias-adjusted log rank test. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival was assessed between high vs low ACFV using Kaplan-Meier analysis with and without inverse probability score weighted adjustment and multivariable Cox proportional hazards. Results: A total of 25 219 men (median age, 71 [IQR, 64-76] years; 78.7% White) with VHR prostate cancer were identified, 6438 (25.5%) of whom were treated at high ACFV facilities. Median follow-up was 57.4 (95% CI, 56.7-58.1) months. Median OS for patients treated at high ACFV centers was 123.4 (95% CI, 116.6-127.4) months vs 109.0 (95% CI, 106.5-111.2) months at low ACFV centers (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, treatment at a high ACFV center was associated with lower risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.95; P < .001). These results were also significant after inverse probability score weighted-based adjustment. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with VHR prostate cancer who underwent definitive radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy, facility case volume was independently associated with longer OS. Further studies are needed to identify which factors unique to high-volume centers may be responsible for this benefit.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsAgedAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogensCohort StudiesHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogens

Identifiers

PMID37552479
PMCPMC10410484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.