Ecological Momentary Assessments and Passive Sensing in the Prediction of Short-Term Suicidal Ideation in Young Adults.

Importance: Advancements in technology, including mobile-based ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) and passive sensing, have immense potential to identify short-term suicide risk. However, the extent to which EMA and passive data, particularly in combination, have utility in detecting short-term risk in everyday life remains poorly understood. Objective: To examine whether and what combinations of self-reported EMA and sensor-based assessments identify next-day suicidal ideation. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this intensive longitudinal prognostic study, participants completed EMAs 4 times daily and wore a sensor wristband (Fitbit Charge 3) for 8 weeks. Multilevel machine learning methods, including penalized generalized estimating equations and classification and regression trees (CARTs) with repeated 5-fold cross-validation, were used to optimize prediction of next-day suicidal ideation based on time-varying features from EMAs (affective, cognitive, behavioral risk factors) and sensor data (sleep, activity, heart rate). Young adult patients who visited an emergency department with recent suicidal ideation and/or suicide attempt were recruited. Identified via electronic health record screening, eligible individuals were contacted remotely to complete enrollment procedures. Participants (aged 18 to 25 years) completed 14 708 EMA observations (64.4% adherence) and wore a sensor wristband approximately half the time (55.6% adherence). Data were collected between June 2020 and July 2021. Statistical analysis was performed from January to March 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome was presence of next-day suicidal ideation. Results: Among 102 enrolled participants, 83 (81.4%) were female; 6 (5.9%) were Asian, 5 (4.9%) were Black or African American, 9 (8.8%) were more than 1 race, and 76 (74.5%) were White; mean (SD) age was 20.9 (2.1) years. The best-performing model incorporated features from EMAs and showed good predictive accuracy (mean [SE] cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.84 [0.02]), whereas the model that incorporated features from sensor data alone showed poor prediction (mean [SE] cross-validated AUC, 0.56 [0.02]). Sensor-based features did not improve prediction when combined with EMAs. Suicidal ideation-related features were the strongest predictors of next-day ideation. When suicidal ideation features were excluded, an alternative EMA model had acceptable predictive accuracy (mean [SE] cross-validated AUC, 0.76 [0.02]). Both EMA models included features at different timescales reflecting within-day, end-of-day, and time-varying cumulative effects. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prognostic study, self-reported risk factors showed utility in identifying near-term suicidal thoughts. Best-performing models required self-reported information, derived from EMAs, whereas sensor-based data had negligible predictive accuracy. These results may have implications for developing decision algorithms identifying near-term suicidal thoughts to guide risk monitoring and intervention delivery in everyday life.