Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37552434›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2023

Single-trial ERP Quantification Using Neural Networks.

Emma Depuydt, Yana Criel, Miet De Letter, Pieter van Mierlo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma DepuydtDepartment of Electronics and Information Systems, Medical Image and Signal Processing Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. emma.depuydt@ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0003-4078-9838
Yana CrielDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, BrainComm Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6455-1803
Miet De LetterDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, BrainComm Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6370-6110
Pieter van MierloDepartment of Electronics and Information Systems, Medical Image and Signal Processing Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1650-5401

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional approaches to quantify components in event-related potentials (ERPs) are based on averaging EEG responses. However, this method ignores the trial-to-trial variability in the component's latency, resulting in a smeared version of the component and underestimates of its amplitude. Different techniques to quantify ERP components in single trials have therefore been described in literature. In this study, two approaches based on neural networks are proposed and their performance was compared with other techniques using simulated data and two experimental datasets. On the simulated dataset, the neural networks outperformed other techniques for most signal-to-noise ratios and resulted in better estimates of the topography and shape of the ERP component. In the first experimental dataset, the highest correlation values between the estimated latencies of the P300 component and the reaction times were obtained using the neural networks. In the second dataset, the single-trial latency estimation techniques showed an amplitude reduction of the N400 effect with age and ascertained this effect could not be attributed to differences in latency variability. These results illustrate the applicability and the added value of neural networks for the quantification of ERP components in individual trials. A limitation, however, is that simulated data is needed to train the neural networks, which can be difficult when the ERP components to be found are not known a priori. Nevertheless, the neural networks-based approaches offer more information on the variability of the timing of the component and result in better estimates of the shape and topography of ERP components.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsEvent-Related Potentials, P300FemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerReaction TimeEvent-related potentialsLatency variabilityN400Neural networksP300Single trial analysis

Identifiers

PMID37552434
PMCPMC10522773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.