ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2024
A Problem in NIH and Federally Funded Prostate Cancer Interventional Clinical Trials.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An In-depth Review onAnti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObesity, diagnosed in 41.1% of African American (AA) men, is a risk factor for prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence, progression, and increased mortality. Obesity is associated with aggressive PCa only in AA men and not White American (WA) men. The overall health of AA PCa patients is also more likely to be adversely affected by comorbid type 2 diabetes (T2D), often an outcome of obesity and a cause of reduced odds of PCa survival. This evidence suggests that preventing and controlling comorbid obesity and T2D in AA men diagnosed with PCa should be a research funding priority.
aimThe aim of this study is to determine if federally funded PCa clinical trials controlled T2D and obesity.
methodsCompleted interventional PCa clinical trials conducted in the USA, funded by the NIH or other federal agency, which included males aged 18-64 years, and reported study protocols were included in the study. We examined the intervention modalities used in the trials to determine if any attempted to control obesity and T2D.
resultsFifty-eight trials met the study inclusion criteria. Of these 11 were excluded from the analysis as they did not report AA men. A total of 5802 men participated in the remaining 47 trials. Of these, 917 (15.8%) were AA and 4885 (84.2%) were WA men. Forty (85.1%) trials used pharmaceutical medication therapies or other clinical procedures. None of the medications or clinical procedures used were indicated for treatment of obesity and T2D. 5 (10.6%) trials addressed treatment preferences, survivorship, coping, function, and incontinence among PCa patients. Only 2 (4.25%) trials examined weight loss and diet.
conclusionsNone of the completed federally funded PCa clinical trials that included AA men used methods to control T2D. Only an insignificant number (4.25%) attempted to control obesity. This gap in therapeutic optimization to control these comorbid conditions indicates a critical area in need of federal funding priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37552424What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.