Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37552281›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Clinical performance, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of an active osseointegrated bone-conduction hearing implant system at 24-month follow-up.

Robert Cowan, Aaran T Lewis, Carina Hallberg, Michael C F Tong, Catherine S Birman, Iris H-Y Ng, Robert Briggs

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04041700 nacompletednot on this map

A Prospective, Multicentre, Open Clinical Investigation Evaluating Clinical Performance, Safety and Patient Reported Outcomes With an Active Osseointegrated Steady-State Implant System (OSI) in Adult Subjects With Conductive Hearing Loss, Mixed Hearing Loss or Single-sided Sensorineural Deafness

TypeinterventionalSponsorCochlearRan2019 to 2020Enrolled29ConditionsHearing LossArmsOsia 2 system
NCT04754477 nacompletednot on this map

A Multicentre, Open, Long-term Clinical Investigation Evaluating Safety, Performance and Patient Reported Outcomes With an Active Osseointegrated Steady-State Implant System in Adult Subjects With Conductive Hearing Loss, Mixed Hearing Loss or Single-sided Sensorineural Deafness.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCochlearRan2021 to 2022Enrolled20ConditionsHearing LossArmsActive Osseointegrated Steady-State Implant System (OSI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring auditory perception experiences in daily situations in autistic adults.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2026
    Article
  3. Cost-effectiveness Analysis Comparing Osia System to Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices in Sweden.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of Different Surgical Techniques for OsiaJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Active piezoelectric bone conduction implant OsiaEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert CowanDepartment of Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Aaran T LewisCochlear Limited, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5373-7231
Carina HallbergCochlear Limited, Sydney, Australia.
Michael C F TongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Institute of Human Communicative Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.
Catherine S BirmanNextsense, Sydney, Australia.
Iris H-Y NgDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Institute of Human Communicative Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6125-2098
Robert BriggsDepartment of Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. rjbriggs@melbourne-ear.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate 2-year post-operative hearing performance, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of hearing-impaired adults treated with the Osia

methodsA prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, within-subject clinical study conducted at three tertiary referral clinical centers located in Melbourne, Sydney and Hong Kong. Twenty adult recipients of the Osia 2 System were enrolled and followed up between 12 and 24 months post-implantation: 17 with mixed or conductive hearing loss and 3 with single-sided sensorineural deafness. Safety data, audiological thresholds, speech recognition thresholds in noise, and patient-reported outcomes were collected and evaluated. In addition, pre-and 6-month post-implantation data were collected retrospectively for this recipient cohort enrolled into the earlier study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04041700).

resultsBetween 6- and 24-month follow-up, there was no statistically significant change in free-field hearing thresholds or speech reception thresholds in noise (p =  > 0.05), indicating that aided improvements were maintained up to 24 months of follow-up. Furthermore, improvements in health-related quality of life and daily hearing ability, as well as clinical and subjective measures of hearing benefit remained stable over the 24-month period. No serious adverse events were reported during extended follow-up.

conclusionsThese study results provide further evidence to support the longer term clinical safety, hearing performance, and patient-related benefits of the Osia 2 System in patients with either a conductive hearing loss, mixed hearing loss, or single-sided sensorineural deafness.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04754477. First posted: February 15, 2021.

Indexed as

DeafnessHearing AidsHearing LossHearing Loss, Mixed Conductive-SensorineuralHearing Loss, SensorineuralSpeech PerceptionAdultBone ConductionFollow-Up StudiesHearingHearing Loss, ConductiveHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesActive transcutaneous bone conduction implantConductive and mixed hearing lossSemi-implantable hearing deviceSingle-sided deafnessSpeech recognition in noiseSpeech recognition in quiet

Identifiers

PMID37552281
PMCPMC10796683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.