Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37552261›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Impact of fat on the apparent T1 value of the liver: assessment by water-only derived T1 mapping.

Mayumi Higashi, Masahiro Tanabe, Masatoshi Yamane, Mahesh B Keerthivasan, Hiroshi Imai, Teppei Yonezawa, Michihiro Nakamura, Katsuyoshi Ito

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical feasibility of accelerated whole liver water TEuropean radiology experimental · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Accelerated Abdominal MRI: A Review of Current Methods and Applications.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025
    Review
  10. T1 Mapping of the Abdomen, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A better understanding of liver T1.European radiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mayumi HigashiDepartment of Radiology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan. mhigashi@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3929-9495
Masahiro TanabeDepartment of Radiology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Masatoshi YamaneDepartment of Radiological Technology, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Mahesh B KeerthivasanMR R&D Collaborations, Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Hiroshi ImaiMR Research and Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Teppei YonezawaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Michihiro NakamuraDepartment of Organ Anatomy & NANOMEDICINE, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Katsuyoshi ItoDepartment of Radiology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Yamaguchi University · JPYamaguchi University Hospital · JPSiemens Healthcare (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the impact of fat on the apparent T1 value of the liver using water-only derived T1 mapping.

methods3-T MRI included 2D Look-Locker T1 mapping and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) mapping. T1 values of the liver were compared among T1 maps obtained by in-phase (IP), opposed-phase (OP), and Dixon water sequences using paired t-test. The correlation between T1 values of the liver on each T1 map and PDFF was assessed using Spearman correlation coefficient. The absolute differences between T1 value of the liver on Dixon water images and that on IP or OP images were also correlated with PDFF.

resultsOne hundred sixty-two patients (median age, 70 [range, 24-91] years, 90 men) were retrospectively evaluated. The T1 values of the liver on each T1 map were significantly different (p < 0.001). The T1 value of the liver on IP images was significantly negatively correlated with PDFF (r =  - 0.438), while the T1 value of the liver on OP images was slightly positively correlated with PDFF (r = 0.164). The T1 value of the liver on Dixon water images was slightly negatively correlated with PDFF (r =  - 0.171). The absolute differences between T1 value of the liver on Dixon water images and that on IP or OP images were significantly correlated with PDFF (r = 0.606, 0.722; p < 0.001).

conclusionFat correction for the apparent T1 value by water-only derived T1 maps will be helpful for accurately evaluating the T1 value of the liver. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Fat-corrected T1 mapping of the liver with the water component only obtained from the 2D Dixon Look-Locker sequence could be useful for accurately evaluating the T1 value of the liver without the impact of fat in daily clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • The T1 values of the liver on the conventional T1 maps are significantly affected by the presence of fat. • The apparent T1 value of the liver on water-only derived T1 maps would be slightly impacted by the presence of fat. • Fat correction for the apparent T1 values is necessary for the accurate assessment of the T1 values of the liver.

Indexed as

Fatty LiverWaterAgedHumansLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProtonsRetrospective StudiesProtonsWaterFatty liverLiverMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID37552261
OpenAlexW4385659475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.