Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37551956›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Bayesian multitask learning for medicine recommendation based on online patient reviews.

Yichen Cheng, Yusen Xia, Xinlei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yichen ChengInstitute for Insight, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States.
Yusen XiaInstitute for Insight, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States.
Xinlei WangDepartment of Mathematics, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8561-6511

Funding

Applying deep learning to predict T cell receptor binding specificity of neoantigens and response to checkpoint inhibitorsR01CA258584 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI WANG, TAO, WANG, XINLEI · 2021 to 2025
$1.4M
Normalizing Gene Expression Data from Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded SamplesR15GM131390 · NIGMS · SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, XINLEI · 2019 to 2019
$432k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA258584NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM131390NIH HHS R01CA258584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationWe propose a drug recommendation model that integrates information from both structured data (patient demographic information) and unstructured texts (patient reviews). It is based on multitask learning to predict review ratings of several satisfaction-related measures for a given medicine, where related tasks can learn from each other for prediction. The learned models can then be applied to new patients for drug recommendation. This is fundamentally different from most recommender systems in e-commerce, which do not work well for new customers (referred to as the cold-start problem). To extract information from review texts, we employ both topic modeling and sentiment analysis. We further incorporate variable selection into the model via Bayesian LASSO, which aims to filter out irrelevant features. To our best knowledge, this is the first Bayesian multitask learning method for ordinal responses. We are also the first to apply multitask learning to medicine recommendation. The sample code and data are made available at GitHub: https://github.com/thrushcyc-github/BMull.

resultsWe evaluate the proposed method on two sets of drug reviews involving 17 depression/high blood pressure-related drugs. Overall, our method performs better than existing benchmark methods in terms of accuracy and AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve). It is effective even with a small sample size and only a few available features, and more robust to possible noninformative covariates. Due to our model explainability, insights generated from our model may work as a useful reference for doctors. In practice, however, a final decision should be carefully made by combining the information from the proposed recommender with doctors' domain knowledge and past experience. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The sample code and data are publicly available at GitHub: https://github.com/thrushcyc-github/BMull.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremMachine LearningPharmaceutical PreparationsHumansPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID37551956
PMCPMC10425196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.