Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37551941›Full record

ArticlePain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2023

Urine drug testing in the context of opioid analgesic prescribing for chronic pain: a content analysis of U.S. state laws in 2022.

Barbara Andraka-Christou, Elizabeth McAvoy, Adam J Gordon, Maggie Ohama, Marilyn Brach, Erin A Taylor, Mary Vaiana, Brendan Saloner, Bradley D Stein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Barbara Andraka-ChristouSchool of Global Health Management & Informatics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32801, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6307-6369
Elizabeth McAvoyO'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States.
Adam J GordonInformatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States.
Maggie OhamaThe Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Gainesville, FL 32605, United States.
Marilyn BrachTrinity College, Hartford, CT 06106, United States.
Erin A TaylorRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 90401, United States.
Mary VaianaRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 90401, United States.
Brendan SalonerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Bradley D SteinRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA 15238, United States.

Funding

The Opioid Crisis: The Effects and Unintended Consequences of State Policies on Opioid Analgesic PrescribingR01DA045055 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI STEIN, BRADLEY D · 2019 to 2022
$2.9M
NIDA NIH HHS # 5R01DA045055-02NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to the opioid crisis, U.S. states have passed laws requiring urine drug testing (UDT) when opioid analgesics are prescribed for chronic pain. We sought to identify state law UDT requirements.

methodsWe searched NexisUni legal database using terms related to UDT, chronic pain, and opioids. We included laws effective during spring 2022 that required UDT when opioids were prescribed for chronic pain. We performed deductive content analysis, coding laws for mandated UDT frequency, type of clinician and type of payer to whom the law applied, and circumstances under which UDT was mandated.

resultsWe found 32 laws across 13 states that met our inclusion criteria. UDT requirements varied substantially by state, including with regard to the type of clinician to whom the law applied, the mandated frequency of UDT (eg, at initiation/assessment, at least annually, more than once per year), and the circumstances in which UDT was mandated (eg, patient had substance use disorder; dosage/day threshold). DISCUSSION: Relatively few states have UDT mandates associated with prescribing opioids as chronic pain treatment. When developing policy indicators for empirical studies, researchers evaluating how UDT policy affects health outcomes must consider the complexity and lack of uniformity of UDT requirements. In addition, even if states mandate UDT, it is unclear whether clinicians understand the best way to use the test results.

Indexed as

Chronic PainSubstance-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidHumansPain ManagementSubstance Abuse DetectionAnalgesics, Opioidanalgesicschronic painlawsopioidspoliciesurine drug screeningurine drug testing

Identifiers

PMID37551941
PMCPMC10690857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.