Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37551703›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of pathology2023

Application of digital pathology-based advanced analytics of tumour microenvironment organisation to predict prognosis and therapeutic response.

Xiao Fu, Erik Sahai, Anna Wilkins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Understanding and targeting the tumour matrisome.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advanced Microscopy Techniques.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Advancing Precision Medicine: Algebraic Topology and Differential Geometry in Radiology and Computational Pathology.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2024
    Review
  17. Using digital pathology to analyze the murine cerebrovasculature.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiao FuTumour Cell Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Erik SahaiTumour Cell Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Anna WilkinsTumour Cell Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0425-584X

Funding

Cancer Research UKDepartment of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the application of advanced analytics, especially artificial intelligence (AI), to digital H&E images, and other histological image types, has begun to radically change how histological images are used in the clinic. Alongside the recognition that the tumour microenvironment (TME) has a profound impact on tumour phenotype, the technical development of highly multiplexed immunofluorescence platforms has enhanced the biological complexity that can be captured in the TME with high precision. AI has an increasingly powerful role in the recognition and quantitation of image features and the association of such features with clinically important outcomes, as occurs in distinct stages in conventional machine learning. Deep-learning algorithms are able to elucidate TME patterns inherent in the input data with minimum levels of human intelligence and, hence, have the potential to achieve clinically relevant predictions and discovery of important TME features. Furthermore, the diverse repertoire of deep-learning algorithms able to interrogate TME patterns extends beyond convolutional neural networks to include attention-based models, graph neural networks, and multimodal models. To date, AI models have largely been evaluated retrospectively, outside the well-established rigour of prospective clinical trials, in part because traditional clinical trial methodology may not always be suitable for the assessment of AI technology. However, to enable digital pathology-based advanced analytics to meaningfully impact clinical care, specific measures of 'added benefit' to the current standard of care and validation in a prospective setting are important. This will need to be accompanied by adequate measures of explainability and interpretability. Despite such challenges, the combination of expanding datasets, increased computational power, and the possibility of integration of pre-clinical experimental insights into model development means there is exciting potential for the future progress of these AI applications. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceTumor MicroenvironmentHumansPrognosisProspective StudiesRetrospective Studiesadvanced analyticsartificial intelligencebiomarkerdigital pathologytumour microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID37551703
PMCPMC10952145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.