Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37551532›Full record

ArticleLa Tunisie medicale

Drug-Eluting-Balloon Angioplasty in Tunisian population versus Everolimus-platinum-chrome-stent for de-novo coronary lesion.

Nadhem Hajlaoui, Aymen Noamen, Ahmed Ben Amara, Haythem Raddaoui, Abdeddayem Haggui, Wafa Fehri

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in La Tunisie medicale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05516446 (Drug Eluting Balloon Angioplasty in Tunisian Population Versus Everolimus Platinum Chrome Stent), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05516446 naunknown statusnot on this map

Drug Eluting Balloon Angioplasty in Tunisian Population Versus Everolimus Platinum Chrome Stent

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeneral Administration of Military Health, TunisiaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled290ConditionsPercutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), De Novo StenosisArmsDEB for de Novo Lesions, DES for de Novo Lesions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nadhem Hajlaoui
Aymen Noamen
Ahmed Ben Amara
Haythem Raddaoui
Abdeddayem Haggui
Wafa Fehri

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

research problemDrug-eluting balloon (DEB) angioplasty is a well-established treatment modality for in-stent restenosis, however its safety and efficacy in de-novo lesion especially in large vessel remains undetermined. Theoretically, DEB sight to eliminate stent thrombosis and reduce restenosis rates by leaving no metal behind.

aimTo compare the results of angioplasty of de novo lesions by DEB (SEQUENT PLEASE) versus DES (Promus Premier and Promus Elite) in a Tunisian population. THE ENDPOINTS will be primarily the Late Lumen Loss at 12 months and secondarily the Major Cardiovascular Event rate (MACE) at 12 months. INVESTIGATIVE PROCESS: This is a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial including 290 patients with chronic coronary disease or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction with de novo lesions. After coronarography, angiographic parameters concerning lesion location and quantitative analysis will be collected. Patients will be treated with DEB or DES according to their allocation group. Before removal of the guide, post-procedural angiographic parameters will be evaluated. Follow-up will be performed for 12 months and an angiographic examination will be performed either as an emergency or at 12 months. The significance level will be 5%. A univariate analysis will be performed to search for predictive factors of MACE. RESEARCH PLAN: Ethical considerations will be undertaken and respected. The study will run for 15 months starting August 25, 2021 Trial registration: NCT05516446.

Identifiers

PMID37551532
PMCPMC10498760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.