ArticleAsian biomedicine : research, reviews and news2022
Autophagy-related genes affect the survival of multiple myeloma patients depending on chromosomal abnormality.
Article in Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Genomics in the Development and Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Understanding the Challenges and Opportunities.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Review
- Luteolin Disrupts Keratinocyte-Dendritic Cell Communication in Psoriasis by Targeting Rh Family C Glycoprotein.Mediators of inflammation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Targeting autophagy at gene level may be promising in multiple myeloma (MM) treatment depending on chromosomal abnormality (ABN) status. Objectives: We aimed to investigate the role of ABN on survival of MM patients and to identify prognosis related autophagy-related genes (ARGs) for patients with or without ABN. Methods: Gene intensity values of 222 ARG for 548 MM patients were obtained from the Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array (GPL570) platform containing 54,675 probes (GSE24080). A dataset containing data from 1576 MM patients with 1q21 amplification (GSE4204, GSE4452, GSE4581, and GSE2658) was used for validation. Survival analysis of the patients was analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression method with the help of R3.53 programming language and Kaplan-Meier graphics were created. The Gene Ontology enRIchmentanaLysis and visuaLizAtion (GOrilla) tool was used to define the related biological processes and pathways. Results: The overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) in all MM patients were strongly influenced by ABN. In the group of patients with ABN, 41 ARGs were found to be important in prognosis, whereas in the group of patients without ABN, 13 ARGs were found to be important in prognosis. Conclusions: The classification of MM patients according to the absence or presence of ABN is important in the determination of survival status. Detection of survival related ARGs in patients with chromosomal anomalies may be a new therapeutic target in treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.