ArticleAsian biomedicine : research, reviews and news2022
Prevalence and management of eosinophilia based on periodic health examinations in primary care clinics.
Article in Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06265870 (Comparison of Outcome Between Specific Anthelminthic Treatment According to Test Results and Empirical Anthelminthic Treatment in Eosinophilic Patient), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Outcome Between Specific Anthelminthic Treatment According to Test Results and Empirical Anthelminthic Treatment in Eosinophilic Patient
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Associated diagnostic spectrum and stratified characteristics of patients with eosinophilia: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Eosinophilia is a common, hematologic abnormality detected in periodic health checkups with diverse etiologies. There are a few clinical practice guidelines for the management of eosinophilia. Objectives: To determine the prevalence of eosinophilia among patients undergoing periodic health examinations, evaluate its management and outcomes, and identify its associated factors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study that included patients with eosinophilia diagnosed during the 2018 periodic health examinations at Songklanagarind Hospital. Results: The prevalence rate of eosinophilia was 9.6% (988/10,299), and most patients (52.6%) were male with a median age of 53.0 (42.0-61.0) years. Only 174 patients (17.6%) were diagnosed and further examined to identify the cause of eosinophilia; including an examination of medical history (18.4%), physical examination (93.1%), laboratory analysis (9.2%), and consultation with internists (14.9%). Empirical anthelmintic therapy was administered in 130 patients (74.7%), and 49.2% achieved resolution. The possible causes of eosinophilia were identified in 20.7% (204/988), the most common cause being atopic disease (51.5%). Patients with moderate-to-severe eosinophilia were significantly more likely to be diagnosed, undergo further laboratory tests, and proceed with consultations with internists (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 3.52 [1.97-6.32], 17.13 [5.74-51.11], and 6.38 [1.95-20.93], respectively). Conclusions: Eosinophilia is commonly identified in periodic health examinations, and most primary physicians lack knowledge regarding the diagnostic work-up required to determine the cause of eosinophilia. Empirical anthelmintic therapy showed satisfactory efficacy for the management of eosinophilia in areas where parasite infection is endemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.