Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37551295›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics & epidemiology2022

Nonparametric inference of complier quantile treatment effects in randomized trials with imperfect compliance.

Lu Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics & epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lu MaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8626-9822

Funding

Novel Statistical Methods for Complex Time-to-Event Data in Cardiovascular Clinical TrialsR01HL149875 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Lu Mao · 2020 to 2026
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To analyze randomized trials with imperfect compliance, a standard approach is to estimate the local average treatment effect in the sub-population of compliers using randomization status as an instrumental variable. Though quantile analysis has been popular in general, the local (or complier) quantile treatment effect (cQTE) as a causal estimand has received insufficient attention. In this paper, we map out the details for the estimation, inference, and sensitivity analysis of the cQTE in a completely nonparametric setting. We propose to estimate the cQTE using nonparametric plug-in estimators of the cumulative distribution functions for the potential outcomes of the compliers. The cQTE estimator is shown to be asymptotically normal, with asymptotic variance estimated through kernel-smoothed density estimators. The procedure is easily extended to adjust for discrete covariates for gains in statistical efficiency. Moreover, by exploiting the stochastic monotonicity of the quantile functional, we develop sensitivity bounds for the cQTE when key assumptions such as exclusion restriction and instrument monotonicity are violated. Extensive simulations show that the proposed methods provide valid inference of the target local estimand and outperform standard intent-to-treat tests, especially under low compliance rates and/or heterogeneous treatment effects. A recent study on a government-funded health insurance program in India is analyzed as an illustration.

Indexed as

Causal inferenceinstrumental variablekernel density estimatorlocal treatment effectssensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID37551295
PMCPMC10406462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.