ArticleCureus2023
Assessment of the Push-Out Bond Strength for Glass Fiber Posts After Different Surface Treatments: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe goal of the study was to assess the push-out bond strength of the glass fibre post after different surface treatments. MATERIALS AND
methodsFor the purpose of the investigation, 40 mandibular premolars were chosen. After gaining access, the biomechanical preparation was completed using the step-back approach up to a size 40K file, and the canals were sealed using gutta-percha cones and the lateral condensation procedure with AH Plus sealer (epoxide-amine resin pulp canal sealer). Peeso reamers were used to remove the canal fillings, leaving 5mm of gutta-percha apically. Drills included in the package were used to prepare the post spaces so that the posts would fit in their respective post slots. These were attached to self-curing acrylic resin blocks. Fibre posts were split into four groupings of n = 10 each for surface treatment, i.e., control, hydrogen fluoride, sandblasting, and hydrogen peroxide. The cementation of posts was done by utilising dual-cure resin cement. Two millimetres of the anatomical crown were removed from each sample. Each sample's 1-mm cervical segment was taken utilising the isotope from the remaining coronal area. To perform a push-out test, at the rate of 0.5mm/min of the crosshead, every sample was inserted into a universal testing device. Each post's dislodge force from the pre-set post spacing was measured. Statistics were utilised to analyse the data.
resultsStrongest bonds were made by silanization, followed by sandblasting (p value=0.002). The weakest bonds were made by the control group.
conclusionThe ultimate deduction was that when glass fibre posts underwent various types of surface treatments followed by silanization, it had a significant impact on increasing their strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.