ArticleCureus2023
Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury During the COVID-19 Pandemic (TELE-SCOPE): A Single-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Multidimensional Effects of Telemedicine on Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Evidence-based position paper on Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) professional practice on telerehabilitation. The European PRM position (UEMS PRM Section).European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Telerehabilitation for Motor Recovery in Adults with Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Across Motor Domains, Delivery Models, and Follow-Up Effects.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- The Safety of Telerehabilitation: Systematic Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2025Review
- A narrative review of AI monitoring in postoperative pain management and functional rehabilitation for spinal cord injury.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has posed numerous challenges in accessing adequate healthcare services, particularly for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). On the other hand, telerehabilitation has emerged as a promising solution to address healthcare needs. Since there was no study during the pandemic, we started this study with the aim of assessing the efficacy of telerehabilitation for individuals with SCI during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods This is a prospective double-blind, randomized, controlled trial conducted in a tertiary rehabilitation care center hospital. Thirty participants with traumatic spinal cord injuries (age 18 years or more, either gender) were equally randomized to the telerehabilitation or control group (1:1). Biweekly telerehabilitation sessions (each session: 30 minutes) were provided. Participants in the control group were advised to continue standard usual care as advised previously during outpatient or inpatient rehabilitation. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) (primary outcome measure) and Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS) (secondary outcome measure) were evaluated at baseline, four weeks, and eight weeks. Results The mean age of the intervention group was 28.2±6.9 years, and the mean age of the control group was 26.3±7.7 years. The self-care (P = 0.03) and mobility domains (P=0.01) of the SCIM III in the intervention group compared to the control group, as determined through a between-group analysis, showed statistically significant differences. CAS also showed improvement in the intervention group compared to the control group. Within-group analysis showed a mean difference of 6.3 points in the intervention group compared to the control group (1.3 points). Conclusion Telerehabilitation intervention is safe, feasible, and effective in improving self-care and mobility domains in persons with spinal cord injuries during the pandemic. It is also effective in reducing the anxiety related to the coronavirus in this population. Further research with a larger sample size and a longer duration is needed to evaluate long-term effectiveness during such crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.