Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37551231›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Compliance of Healthcare Providers With the Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Waleed K Alshamari, Khalid Aldawwas, Mefawez K Al Shammari, Yazeed K Alshammari, Sulaiman I Alsuwailem, Eid H Alkhaldi, Khalid S Almutairi, Salma Alotaby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Waleed K AlshamariPreventive Medicine, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, SAU.
Khalid AldawwasPreventive Medicine, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, SAU.
Mefawez K Al ShammariFamily Medicine, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Yazeed K AlshammariOccupational Therapy, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Sulaiman I AlsuwailemPreventive Medicine, Saudi Public Health Authority, Riyadh, SAU.
Eid H AlkhaldiPreventive Medicine, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, SAU.
Khalid S AlmutairiPreventive Medicine, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, SAU.
Salma AlotabyNursing, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Though reporting notifiable diseases is obligatory in Saudi Arabia, and the Saudi Ministry of Health establishes guidelines, there are concerns about healthcare providers' compliance, and studies evaluating the notifiable diseases surveillance system (NDSS) are lacking, underlying the urgent need to assess the compliance of healthcare providers with the NDSS in Saudi Arabia. Methods This cross-sectional study involved doctors, nurses, and epidemiologists working in healthcare facilities in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The data collection was done using a self-administered questionnaire. SPSS version 27 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used for statistical analyses. Results We included 420 participants enrolled in our study, and 63.1% were female. Of 51.4% of participants who worked in private healthcare facilities, 75.7% of them were nurses, while the majority of those working in governmental facilities were doctors (69.1%). The age range was 20-62 years, and the dominant age group was 31-40 years (63.8%). Most participants had no training in epidemiology (79.7%) and of those trained, 64% had a certificate training level. Most notifiable diseases worked were detected in governmental health facilities (35.6% vs. 18.8%). Of those who identified notifiable diseases, 84.3% notified them. COVID-19, measles, and hepatitis A, B, and C were the most notified diseases. The lack of knowledge of the notification system was the most common barrier to the notification among 81 nurses, 39 doctors, and one epidemiologist. There was a significant relationship between being a doctor in the governmental institution and notification timeline (p = 0.024). Conclusion This study showed that identifying notifiable diseases was poor despite good compliance among those who identified them. This study showed the lack of proper training of participants, explaining poor knowledge. The findings highlight the differences in notification practices between private and governmental facilities and the need for educational interventions to tackle the knowledge barrier reported.

Indexed as

compliancehealthcare providersnotifiable diseasesnotifiable diseases surveillance systemriyadhsurveillance system

Identifiers

PMID37551231
PMCPMC10404456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.