Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37551221›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection in Pediatric Skull Base Chordoma: A Systematic Review.

Thamer H Alsharif, Amin G Gronfula, Lamees H Alghdali, Mayasim Hejazi, Abdulkarim Alanazi, Sahal M Wali, Mohammed Alyousef

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Indications and Limits of Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches in Pediatric Neurosurgery.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thamer H AlsharifNeurosurgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, IRL.
Amin G GronfulaOrthopaedic Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, IRL.
Lamees H AlghdaliInternal Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, IRL.
Mayasim HejaziEmergency Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, IRL.
Abdulkarim AlanaziRadiology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, IRL.
Sahal M WaliSurgery, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Mohammed AlyousefSurgery, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The endoscopic approach has been recommended as a primary option for treating chordomas, and it is associated with better resection rates and fewer surgical complications than transcranial surgery. This review aimed to assess the long-term consequences and evidence in the current literature regarding the endoscopic approach's efficacy in treating skull-base chordoma in children. A systematic review was conducted based on the PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases to examine the clinical outcomes of endoscopic endonasal surgery for pediatric skull base chordoma tumors. The review included studies published in English that employed specific research designs and reported on pediatric patients with skull base chordoma. Of the 268 studies initially considered, 25 met our eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. The average age of the patients was 11.5 years, with approximately equal number of males and females. The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) was the most commonly used modality. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 62.7% of patients, while 18.09% had a subtotal resection (STR), and 13.83% had near-total resection only. Most patients showed significant to moderate improvement from their baseline condition and had no recurrence during their follow-up. Our findings further endorse that the endoscopic approach is a viable primary treatment option for pediatric skull base chordoma.

Indexed as

childrenchordomaendoscopic resectionpediatricskull base

Identifiers

PMID37551221
PMCPMC10404338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.