Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37551103›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2023

Patient and citizen participation at the organizational level in health technology assessment: an exploratory study in five jurisdictions.

Hervé Nabarette, Marie-Hélène Chastenay, Jean-Claude K Dupont, Isabelle Ganache, Ann N V Single

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Two decades of impact: lessons from the HTAi Patient and Citizen Involvement in HTA Interest Group.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hervé NabaretteAssociation Française contre les Myopathies - Téléthon, Evry, France.
Marie-Hélène ChastenayInstitut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jean-Claude K DupontInstitut Pasteur, Legal Department, Ethics Unit and Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Cité, Inserm, Laboratoire ETREs, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8951-3704
Isabelle GanacheInstitut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Ann N V SinglePatient Voice Initiative, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6601-0349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWhile patient participation in individual health technology assessments (HTAs) has been frequently described in the literature, patient and citizen participation at the organizational level is less described and may be less understood and practiced in HTA bodies. We aimed to better understand its use by describing current practice.

methodTo elicit descriptive case studies and insights we conducted semi-structured interviews and open-ended questionnaires with HTA body staff and patients and citizens participating at the organizational level in Belgium, France, Quebec, Scotland, and Wales.

resultsWe identified examples of organizational participation in managerial aspects: governance, defining patient involvement processes, evaluation processes and methods, and capacity building. Mechanisms included consultation, collaboration, and membership of standing (permanent) groups. These were sometimes combined. Participants were usually from umbrella patient organizations and patient associations, as well as individual patients and citizens. DISCUSSION: Although the concept, participation at the organizational level, is not well-established, we observed a trend toward growth in each jurisdiction. Some goals were shared for this participation, but HTA bodies focused more on instrumental goals, especially improving participation in HTAs, while patients and citizens were more likely to offer democratic and developmental goals beyond improving participation processes.

conclusionOur findings provide rationales for organizational-level participation from the perspectives of HTA bodies and patients. The case studies provide insights into how to involve participants and who may be seen as legitimate participants. These findings may be useful to HTA bodies, the patient sector, and communities when devising an organizational-level participation framework.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationPatientsBelgiumHumansQuebecScotlandTechnology Assessment, Biomedicalcase studieshealthorganizationalorganizational policypatient participationpublic participationtechnology assessment

Identifiers

PMID37551103
PMCPMC11570056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.