Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37551082›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2026

Initial clinical experience with the Bendit steerable articulating tip microcatheter for intracranial access and intervention.

Yang Qiao, Yi J Zhang, Samuel Tsappidi, Tej I Mehta, Ferdinand K Hui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Early experience with the SmartGUIDE: A new generation of in-situ deflectable 0.014-inch guidewire.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yang QiaoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4995-6073
Yi J ZhangDepartment of Neurointerventional Surgery, The Queen's Health Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Samuel TsappidiDepartment of Neurointerventional Surgery, The Queen's Health Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Tej I MehtaDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ferdinand K HuiDepartment of Neurointerventional Surgery, The Queen's Health Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundThe increasing complexity and sophistication of neurovascular implants and other therapeutic devices depend on access and delivery systems. Advancements in access technologies are required to improve minimally invasive endovascular procedures. Steerable catheters have been available in other disciplines, however, their implementation in neurovascular interventions has been a barrier previously due to issues with miniaturization and vascular caliber/complexity.MethodsA retrospective review of the neurovascular stroke database was conducted in accordance with local IRB to identify patients that received neurointerventional endovascular procedures using a novel first iteration 0.021'' microcatheter with controlled articulating tip flexion. Indications, management, demographics, comorbidities, and clinical and technical outcomes were recorded and analyzed. Primary operator feedback on the novel catheter was collected and reviewed.ResultsTen consecutive patients receiving treatment that involved a novel steerable 0.021'' microcatheter were identified and analyzed. No complications were reported. Novel useful features of the catheter were reported on a case-by-case basis.ConclusionsInitial clinical experience with the controlled articulation that permits flexion at the tip of the microcatheter demonstrated it to be safe. Access to difficult proximal origin curves, and distal clinoidal/ophthalmic segment anatomy may be improved due to the high torque transmission, and acute angulation of this microcatheter. Further experience with the delivery of therapeutic devices will be necessary to better understand the potential role that the present catheter may play in modern neurointerventional procedures.

Indexed as

CathetersEndovascular ProceduresStrokeAdultAgedCerebral AngiographyEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMiniaturizationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBenditinnovationMicrocatheternew technologysteerable tip

Identifiers

PMID37551082
PMCPMC13305488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.