Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37551050›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2023

Amlodipine in the current management of hypertension.

Ji-Guang Wang, Biff F Palmer, Katherine Vogel Anderson, Peter Sever

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Reinventing amlodipine.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Calcium channel blocker overdose: Not all the same toxicity.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. An overview of pyridazin-3(2Future medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ji-Guang WangThe Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8511-1524
Biff F PalmerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Katherine Vogel AndersonDepartment of Pharmacotherapy & Translational Research, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Peter SeverNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBRuijin Hospital · CNThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension is the leading cause of death worldwide, affecting 1.4 billion people. Treatment options include the widely used calcium channel blockers, among which amlodipine, a dihydropyridine, has unique characteristics that distinguish it from other drugs within this class. This review aims to provide an updated overview of the evidence supporting the use of amlodipine over the past 30 years and highlights its cardiovascular benefits in current hypertension management. Amlodipine has low renal clearance (7 mL/min/mg) and long half-life (35-50 h) and duration of action, which allows it to sustain its anti-hypertensive effect for more than 24 h following a single dose. Additionally, blood pressure (BP) control is maintained even when a dose has been missed, providing continuous protection in case of incidental noncompliance. It has proven to reduce BP variability and successfully lower BP. Amlodipine also controls BP in patients with a systolic/diastolic BP of 130/80 mm Hg or higher, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease without worsening glycemic or kidney function. Additionally, amlodipine is a wise choice for older adults due to its ability to control BP and protect against stroke and myocardial infarction. Side effects of amlodipine include edema, palpitations, dizziness, and flushing, which are more common with the higher dose of 10 mg. Amlodipine is cost effective and predicted to be cost saving when compared with usual care.

Indexed as

AmlodipineHypertensionAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCalcium Channel BlockersHumansAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel Blockersamlodipineblood pressure variabilitycalcium channel blockershypertension

Identifiers

PMID37551050
PMCPMC10497034
OpenAlexW4385661052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.