Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37550878›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of pathology2023

Unleashing the potential of AI for pathology: challenges and recommendations.

Amina Asif, Kashif Rajpoot, Simon Graham, David Snead, Fayyaz Minhas, Nasir Rajpoot

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Unveiling the risks of ChatGPT in diagnostic surgical pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amina AsifTissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4424-3093
Kashif RajpootSchool of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Simon GrahamHistofy Ltd, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham, UK.
David SneadHistofy Ltd, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham, UK.
Fayyaz MinhasTissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Nasir RajpootTissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 17/84/07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational pathology is currently witnessing a surge in the development of AI techniques, offering promise for achieving breakthroughs and significantly impacting the practices of pathology and oncology. These AI methods bring with them the potential to revolutionize diagnostic pipelines as well as treatment planning and overall patient care. Numerous peer-reviewed studies reporting remarkable performance across diverse tasks serve as a testimony to the potential of AI in the field. However, widespread adoption of these methods in clinical and pre-clinical settings still remains a challenge. In this review article, we present a detailed analysis of the major obstacles encountered during the development of effective models and their deployment in practice. We aim to provide readers with an overview of the latest developments, assist them with insights into identifying some specific challenges that may require resolution, and suggest recommendations and potential future research directions. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHumansUnited Kingdomartificial intelligencecomputational pathologydeep learninghistopathologymachine learningwhole slide images

Identifiers

PMID37550878
PMCPMC10952719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.