Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37550695›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2023

Preliminary psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the structured interview of personality organization (STIPO-CH).

Yang Wang, Zirong Li, Jie Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yang WangBeijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health Clinical and Health Psychology Department,School of Psychological and Cognitive Science, Peking University, 5 Yiheyuan Road, Beijing, 100871, China.
Zirong LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health Clinical and Health Psychology Department,School of Psychological and Cognitive Science, Peking University, 5 Yiheyuan Road, Beijing, 100871, China.
Jie ZhongBeijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health Clinical and Health Psychology Department,School of Psychological and Cognitive Science, Peking University, 5 Yiheyuan Road, Beijing, 100871, China. jzhong@pku.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKernberg originally proposed the psychoanalytic concept of personality organization (PO), which measures personality pathology from a dimensional approach with multiple scales and can be evaluated using the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO) from six domains: identity, object relations, primitive defenses, coping vs. rigidity, aggression, and moral values. The present study translated the original version into the Chinese STIPO (STIPO-CH) version and evaluated its reliability and validity.

methodsThe STIPO-CH was administered to 49 non-clinical subjects. They also completed the Chinese version of the Inventory of Personality Organization and the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory to evaluate criterion-related reliability. Interrater reliability was assessed with intraclass correlations. An item analysis was carried out to explore the structure and internal consistency.

resultsInterrater reliability (intraclass correlations) ranged from 0.98 to 0.99. Results suggested acceptable internal consistency for identity and moral values. The correlations between STIPO-CH domains and self-report questionnaires indicated that construct validity and criterion-related validity were acceptable to good.

conclusionsOverall, this study presents preliminary psychometric properties of STIPO-CH. Limitations regarding the sample, interviewers, and cultural differences are discussed. Future research is highly recommended.

Indexed as

PersonalityPersonality DisordersAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesPersonality disorderPersonality organizationReliabilityStructured interviewValidity

Identifiers

PMID37550695
PMCPMC10405419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.