Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37550660›Full record

SynthesisBMC ophthalmology2023

Magnetic resonance imaging parameters on lacrimal gland in thyroid eye disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nicole Tsz Yan Wong, Ka Fai Kevin Yuen, Fatema Mohamed Ali Abdulla Aljufairi, Kenneth Ka Hei Lai, Zhichao Hu, Karen Kar Wun Chan, Clement Chee Yung Tham, Chi Pui Pang, Kelvin Kam Lung Chong

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Imaging features of lacrimal gland disease.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicole Tsz Yan WongDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China.
Ka Fai Kevin YuenDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China.
Fatema Mohamed Ali Abdulla AljufairiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China.
Kenneth Ka Hei LaiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China.
Zhichao HuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China.
Karen Kar Wun ChanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China.
Clement Chee Yung ThamDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China.
Chi Pui PangDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China.
Kelvin Kam Lung ChongDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China. chongkamlung@cuhk.edu.hk.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · CNPrince of Wales Hospital · CNTung Wah Eastern Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThyroid eye disease is an extrathyroidal manifestation of Graves' disease and is associated with dry eye disease. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging lacrimal gland parameters in thyroid eye disease diagnosis, activity grading, and therapeutic responses prediction.

methodsUp to 23 August, 2022, 504 studies from PubMed and Cochrane Library were analyzed. After removing duplicates and imposing selection criteria, nine eligible studies were included. Risk of bias assessment was done. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effect model if heterogeneity was significant. Otherwise, fixed-effect model was used. Main outcome measures include seven structural magnetic resonance imaging parameters (lacrimal gland herniation, maximum axial area, maximum coronal area, maximum axial length, maximum coronal length, maximum axial width, maximum coronal width), and three functional magnetic resonance imaging parameters (diffusion tensor imaging-fractional anisotropy, diffusion tensor imaging-apparent diffusion coefficient or mean diffusivity, diffusion-weighted imaging-apparent diffusion coefficient).

resultsThyroid eye disease showed larger maximum axial area, maximum coronal area, maximum axial length, maximum axial width, maximum coronal width, diffusion tensor imaging-apparent diffusion coefficient/ mean diffusivity, and lower diffusion tensor imaging-fractional anisotropy than controls. Active thyroid eye disease showed larger lacrimal gland herniation, maximum coronal area, diffusion-weighted imaging-apparent diffusion coefficient than inactive. Lacrimal gland dimensional (maximum axial area, maximum coronal area, maximum axial length, maximum axial width, maximum coronal width) and functional parameters (diffusion tensor imaging-apparent diffusion coefficient, diffusion tensor imaging-apparent diffusion coefficient) could be used for diagnosing thyroid eye disease; lacrimal gland herniation, maximum coronal area, and diffusion-weighted imaging-apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating active from inactive thyroid eye disease; diffusion tensor imaging parameters (diffusion tensor imaging-fractional anisotropy, diffusion tensor imaging-mean diffusivity) and lacrimal gland herniation for helping grading and therapeutic responses prediction respectively.

conclusionsMagnetic resonance imaging lacrimal gland parameters can detect active thyroid eye disease and differentiate thyroid eye disease from controls. Maximum coronal area is the most effective indicator for thyroid eye disease diagnosis and activity grading. There are inconclusive results showing whether structural or functional lacrimal gland parameters have diagnostic superiority. Future studies are warranted to determine the use of magnetic resonance imaging lacrimal gland parameters in thyroid eye disease.

Indexed as

Graves OphthalmopathyLacrimal ApparatusDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingOutcome Assessment, Health CareGraves’ ophthalmopathyGraves’ orbitopathy, lacrimal glandMagnetic resonance imagingMeta-analysisSystematic reviewThyroid-associated ophthalmopathyThyroid eye disease

Identifiers

PMID37550660
PMCPMC10408192
OpenAlexW4385621594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.