Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37550464›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Maximum Lyapunov exponent-based multiple chaotic slime mold algorithm for real-world optimization.

Jiaru Yang, Yu Zhang, Ting Jin, Zhenyu Lei, Yuki Todo, Shangce Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiaru YangFaculty of Engineering, University of Toyama, Toyama-shi, 930-8555, Japan.
Yu ZhangFaculty of Engineering, University of Toyama, Toyama-shi, 930-8555, Japan.
Ting JinSchool of Science, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.
Zhenyu LeiFaculty of Engineering, University of Toyama, Toyama-shi, 930-8555, Japan.
Yuki TodoFaculty of Electrical, Information and Communication Engineering, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa, 9201192, Japan.
Shangce GaoFaculty of Engineering, University of Toyama, Toyama-shi, 930-8555, Japan. gaosc@eng.u-toyama.ac.jp.

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJSP2145Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP22H03643
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Slime mold algorithm (SMA) is a nature-inspired algorithm that simulates the biological optimization mechanisms and has achieved great results in various complex stochastic optimization problems. Owing to the simulated biological search principle of slime mold, SMA has a unique advantage in global optimization problem. However, it still suffers from issues of missing the optimal solution or collapsing to local optimum when facing complicated problems. To conquer these drawbacks, we consider adding a novel multi-chaotic local operator to the bio-shock feedback mechanism of SMA to compensate for the lack of exploration of the local solution space with the help of the perturbation nature of the chaotic operator. Based on this, we propose an improved algorithm, namely MCSMA, by investigating how to improve the probabilistic selection of chaotic operators based on the maximum Lyapunov exponent (MLE), an inherent property of chaotic maps. We implement the comparison between MCSMA with other state-of-the-art methods on IEEE Congress on Evolution Computation (CEC) i.e., CEC2017 benchmark test suits and CEC2011 practical problems to demonstrate its potency and perform dendritic neuron model training to test the robustness of MCSMA on classification problems. Finally, the parameters' sensitivities of MCSMA, the utilization of the solution space, and the effectiveness of the MLE are adequately discussed.

Identifiers

PMID37550464
PMCPMC10406909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.