Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37550439›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2024

Pharmacogenomic testing for antidepressant treatment selection: lessons learned and roadmap forward.

Mark A Frye, Charles B Nemeroff

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dynamic and accessible pharmacogenomic results: a response to pharmacogenomic testing for antidepressant treatment selection.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark A FryeDepartment of Psychiatry & Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA. mfrye@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6997-4215
Charles B NemeroffDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7867-1160
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacogenomic technology is a developing field with enthusiastic interest and broad application potential. Three large, controlled studies have been published exploring the benefit of pharmacogenomically guided antidepressant treatment selection. Though all three studies did not show significant benefit of using this technology, these studies laid the foundation for further research that should address the limitations of this previous research and currently available commercial platforms. Future research needs to include large scale pharmacogenomic trials with GWAS analytics across diverse groups with attention to cost-effectiveness models, particularly for cases of treatment resistance and polypharmacy. The application of results from these large scale pharmacogenomic trials must also include exploring optimal EHR user interface design.

Indexed as

PharmacogeneticsPharmacogenomic TestingAntidepressive AgentsResearch DesignAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID37550439
PMCPMC10700565
OpenAlexW4385637312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.