ArticleScientific reports2023
Combining atomic force microscopy and fluorescence-based techniques to explore mechanical properties of naive and ischemia-affected brain regions in mice.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathological extracellular matrix changes in decellularized normal appearing gray matter and subpial multiple sclerosis lesions.iScience · 2026Article
- Chemokine-Receptor Modulation Shapes Neuroinflammatory and Biomechanical Responses in Organotypic Hippocampal Cultures After Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Novel Diffuse Midline Glioma-on-Chip Recapitulating Tumor Biophysical Microenvironment to Assess the Heterogeneity of Response to Therapies.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Birth mode is associated with layer-specific mechanical changes in fetal membranes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Protein fibril aggregation on red blood cells: a potential biomarker to distinguish neurodegenerative diseases from healthy aging.Brain communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge of the brain's structure and function is essential for understanding processes in health and disease. Histochemical and fluorescence-based techniques have proven beneficial in characterizing brain regions and cellular compositions in pre-clinical research. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been introduced for mechanical tissue characterization, which may also help investigate pathophysiological aspects in disease-related models such as stroke. While combining AFM and fluorescence-based techniques, this study explored the mechanical properties of naive and ischemic brain regions in mice. Ischemia-affected regions were identified by the green signal of fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated albumin. A semi-automated protocol based on a brain atlas allowed regional allocations to the neocortex, striatum, thalamus, hypothalamus, hippocampus, and fiber tracts. Although AFM led to varying measurements, intra-individual analyses indicated a gradually increased tissue stiffness in the neocortex compared to subcortical areas, i.e., the striatum and fiber tracts. Regions affected by ischemia predominantly exhibited an increased tissue stiffness compared to those of the contra-lateral hemisphere, which might be related to cellular swelling. This study indicated intra-individual differences in mechanical properties among naive and ischemia-affected brain regions. The combination of AFM, semi-automated regional allocations, and fluorescence-based techniques thus qualifies for mechanical characterizations of the healthy and disease-affected brain in pre-clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.