ArticleeNeuro2023
High-Sensitivity Intrinsic Optical Signal Imaging Through Flexible, Low-Cost Adaptations of an Upright Microscope.
Article in eNeuro, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Cerebellar climbing fibers impact experience-dependent plasticity in the mouse primary somatosensory cortex.eLife · 2025Article
- Cerebellar climbing fibers impact experience-dependent plasticity in the mouse primary somatosensory cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Cortical α-synuclein pathology induces cell autonomous neuronal hypoactivity and compensatory circuit changes in a model of early Lewy body dementia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Dynamic recruitment of PV interneurons in the somatosensory cortex induced by experience dependent plasticity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Cerebral blood flow and energy demand: imaging insights into neurovascular function.Neurophotonics · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intrinsic optical signal imaging (IOSI) is a staple technique in modern neuroscience. Pioneered >30 years ago, IOSI allows macroscopic mapping of neuronal activity throughout the cortex. The technique has been used to study sensory processing and experience-dependent plasticity, and is often used as an adjunctive procedure to localize cortical areas for subsequent targeting by other imaging or physiology techniques. Despite the ubiquity of IOSI in neuroscience, there are few commercially available turn-key IOSI systems. As a result, investigators have typically resorted to building their own imaging systems. Over the years, simplified systems built either as dedicated rigs or incorporated into existing microscope platforms have been developed. Here we present a straightforward set of adaptations that can be applied to any standard upright microscope, using readily available, inexpensive, commercial parts for illumination, optics, and signal detection, that enables high-sensitivity IOSI. Using these adaptations, we are able to readily map sensory-evoked signals across the somatosensory and visual cortex, including single-whisker barrel cortical activity maps in mice. We show that these IOSI maps are highly reproducible across animals and can be used to study plasticity mechanisms in the somatosensory cortex. We also provide open-source applications to control illumination and analyze raw data to generate activity maps. We anticipate that these resources will be useful for neuroscience investigators looking to add IOSI capabilities to an existing microscope in the laboratory on a budget.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.