Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37550032›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2023

Understanding interventions delivered in the emergency department targeting improved asthma outcomes beyond the emergency department: an integrative review.

Imogen Skene, Emma Kinley, Katherine Pike, Chris Griffiths, Paul Pfeffer, Liz Steed

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Imogen SkeneWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5215-2899
Emma KinleyAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Edinburgh, UK.
Katherine PikeBristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK.
Chris GriffithsWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7935-8694
Paul PfefferWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
Liz SteedWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK e.a.steed@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1926-3196

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe emergency department (ED) represents a place and moment of opportunity to provide interventions to improve long-term asthma outcomes, but feasibility, effectiveness and mechanisms of impact are poorly understood. We aimed to review the existing literature on interventions that are delivered in the ED for adults and adolescents, targeting asthma outcomes beyond the ED, and to code the interventions according to theory used, and to understand the barriers and facilitators to their implementation.

methodsWe systematically searched seven electronic databases and research registers, and manually searched reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative studies that reported on interventions delivered in the ED which aimed to improve asthma outcomes beyond management of the acute exacerbation, for adolescents or adults were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and informed study interpretation. Theory was coded using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Findings were summarised by narrative synthesis.

results12 articles were included, representing 10 unique interventions, including educational and medication-based changes (6 randomised controlled trials and 4 non-randomised studies). Six trials reported statistically significant improvements in one or more outcome measures relating to long-term asthma control, including unscheduled healthcare, asthma control, asthma knowledge or quality of life. We identified limited use of theory in the intervention designs with only one intervention explicitly underpinned by theory. There was little reporting on facilitators or barriers, although brief interventions appeared more feasible.

conclusionThe results of this review suggest that ED-based asthma interventions may be capable of improving long-term outcomes. However, there was significant variation in the range of interventions, reported outcomes and duration of follow-up. Future interventions would benefit from using behaviour change theory, such as constructs from the Theoretical Domains Framework. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD 42020223058.

Indexed as

AsthmaEmergency Medical ServicesAdolescentAdultEmergency Service, HospitalHumansQuality of Lifeaccident & emergency medicineasthmapreventive medicine

Identifiers

PMID37550032
PMCPMC10407367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.