Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37550021›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Vaginal birth core information set: study protocol for a Delphi study to achieve a consensus on a 'core information set' for vaginal birth.

Andrew Demetri, Anna Davies, Danya Bakhbakhi, Sharea Ijaz, Sarah Dawson, Sheelagh McGuinness, Gemma Beasor, Gemma Clayton, Abigail Johnson, Chloë de Souza and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How Should We Communicate Information Regarding Birth Choices to Women?: An Online Randomised Survey.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. What Should Be Discussed When Considering a Vaginal Birth? A Delphi Consensus Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Informing Decision-Making About Caesarean Birth: A Delphi Study to Develop a Core Information Set.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Andrew DemetriUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2820-5919
Anna DaviesUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0743-6547
Danya BakhbakhiUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1906-5069
Sharea IjazUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5727-1790
Sarah DawsonUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Sheelagh McGuinnessUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Gemma BeasorPatient Representative, Bristol, UK.
Gemma ClaytonUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Abigail JohnsonNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Chloë de SouzaNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Aine DempseyUniversity Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Gabriella SnookNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Andrew SharpCentre for Women's Health Research, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
David LissauerCentre for Women's Health Research, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Emma McGoldrickLiverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Christy BurdenUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Abi MerrielUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK abi.merriel@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0352-2106

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStudies have shown that women are often underinformed about potential benefits and risks of vaginal birth. This is in contrast to other modes of birth, such as caesarean birth, for which the risks/benefits are often conveyed prior to undergoing the procedure. A core information set (CIS) is an agreed set of information points that should be discussed with all patients prior to undergoing a procedure or intervention. This CIS could improve the quality of information given regarding mode of birth options, as women will be given information prioritised by patients and stakeholders regarding vaginal birth, empowering them to make informed decisions about their birth. We aim to describe the protocol for the development of this vaginal birth CIS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will develop the CIS by: (1) Compiling a 'long-list' of information points about vaginal birth by: undertaking a scoping review of studies and patient information leaflets; interviews with antenatal/postnatal women, an online survey of stakeholders. (2) Collating the 'long-list' of information points and developing the Delphi survey. Think-aloud interviews will refine the survey. (3) Conducting a two-round Delphi survey. 200 stakeholder participants will be recruited. Items rated critically important by ≥80% of participants in one stakeholder group, or with no consensus, will be carried through to a stakeholder consensus meeting to decide the final CIS. Planned start date is 1 June 2022. Planned end date is 31 August 2023. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project has been given a favourable ethics opinion by the University of Bristol Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 10530). Approval from the ethics committee will be sought for any protocol amendments, and the principal investigator will be responsible for these changes. Findings will be presented at relevant conferences and published in a high-impact journal. We will disseminate the CIS, via Policy Bristol, to clinical policy and guideline developers.

Indexed as

ParturitionResearch DesignConsensusDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansPregnancyReview Literature as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeConsensusCore information setDelphi techniqueInformed consentStakeholdersVaginal birthWomenWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID37550021
PMCPMC10407363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.