Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37549389›Full record

ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2023

Estimating Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis After Screening Mammography Among Older Women in the United States.

Ilana B Richman, Jessica B Long, Pamela R Soulos, Shi-Yi Wang, Cary P Gross

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Social Drivers of Guideline-Discordant Breast Cancer Screening by Age and Mortality Risk.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Diagnostic yield of surveillance mammography among older women.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026
    Article
  11. Surveillance mammography in older women-should we press on?Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Breast cancer diagnosis at age 85 and older.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilana B RichmanSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine; and Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (I.B.R., J.B.L., P.R.S., C.P.G.).ORCID 0000-0001-7438-8907
Jessica B LongSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine; and Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (I.B.R., J.B.L., P.R.S., C.P.G.).
Pamela R SoulosSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine; and Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (I.B.R., J.B.L., P.R.S., C.P.G.).
Shi-Yi WangCancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine; and Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut (S.-Y.W.).ORCID 0000-0002-3294-5784
Cary P GrossSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine; and Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale Cancer Center and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (I.B.R., J.B.L., P.R.S., C.P.G.).
Yale Cancer Center · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Supporting Personalized Decision Making for Breast Cancer Screening among Older WomenK08CA248725 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI RICHMAN, ILANA · 2021 to 2025
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032INCI NIH HHS K08 CA248725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOverdiagnosis is increasingly recognized as a harm of breast cancer screening, particularly for older women.

objectiveTo estimate overdiagnosis associated with breast cancer screening among older women by age.

designRetrospective cohort study comparing the cumulative incidence of breast cancer among older women who continued screening in the next interval with those who did not. Analyses used competing risk models, stratified by age.

settingFee-for-service Medicare claims, linked to the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) program. PATIENTS: Women 70 years and older who had been recently screened. MEASUREMENTS: Breast cancer diagnoses and breast cancer death for up to 15 years of follow-up.

resultsThis study included 54 635 women. Among women aged 70 to 74 years, the adjusted cumulative incidence of breast cancer was 6.1 cases (95% CI, 5.7 to 6.4) per 100 screened women versus 4.2 cases (CI, 3.5 to 5.0) per 100 unscreened women. An estimated 31% of breast cancer among screened women were potentially overdiagnosed. For women aged 75 to 84 years, cumulative incidence was 4.9 (CI, 4.6 to 5.2) per 100 screened women versus 2.6 (CI, 2.2 to 3.0) per 100 unscreened women, with 47% of cases potentially overdiagnosed. For women aged 85 and older, the cumulative incidence was 2.8 (CI, 2.3 to 3.4) among screened women versus 1.3 (CI, 0.9 to 1.9) among those not, with up to 54% overdiagnosis. We did not see statistically significant reductions in breast cancer-specific death associated with screening. LIMITATIONS: This study was designed to estimate overdiagnosis, limiting our ability to draw conclusions on all benefits and harms of screening. Unmeasured differences in risk for breast cancer and differential competing mortality between screened and unscreened women may confound results. Results were sensitive to model specifications and definition of a screening mammogram.

conclusionContinued breast cancer screening was associated with greater incidence of breast cancer, suggesting overdiagnosis may be common among older women who are diagnosed with breast cancer after screening. Whether harms of overdiagnosis are balanced by benefits and for whom remains an important question. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Cancer Institute.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMedicareOverdiagnosisRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37549389
PMCPMC10623662
OpenAlexW4385622320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.