Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37549333›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs (Project Hope)2023

Adoption Of Standard Medical Deduction Increased SNAP Enrollment And Benefits In 21 Participating States.

Jun Li, Dongmei Zuo, Colleen M Heflin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jun LiJun Li (jli208@syr.edu), Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York.
Dongmei ZuoDongmei Zuo, Syracuse University.
Colleen M HeflinColleen M. Heflin, Syracuse University.

Funding

Center for Aging and Policy Studies (CAPS) Core D: External Research Resources Support and Dissemination CoreP30AG066583 · NIA · SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY · PI WILMOTH, JANET M · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) reduces food insecurity but is underused among many households. To increase SNAP participation, twenty-one states have adopted the standard medical deduction (SMD), which simplifies administrative requirements for eligible households (those with older adults or people with disabilities). However, to offset the costs of the SMD, states have reduced SNAP benefits elsewhere, raising concerns of negative spillover effects. Using national data from the period 2004-19 and a fixed-effects estimator, we found that the SMD was associated with increased SNAP participation among SMD-eligible households, in terms of aggregate household counts (20 percent) and as a share of households receiving SNAP (5 percentage points). Moreover, estimated annual SNAP benefits per state increased for SMD-eligible households but decreased (although not statistically significantly) for ineligible households. Offsetting SNAP costs may have benefited households with older adults and households with people with disabilities at the expense of others.

Indexed as

Food AssistancePersons with DisabilitiesAgedCosts and Cost AnalysisFamily CharacteristicsFood SupplyHumansPovertyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37549333
PMCPMC10500947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.