Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37549186›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of bioethics : AJOB2024

Proposed Principles for International Bioethics Conferencing: Anti-Discriminatory, Global, and Inclusive.

Nancy S Jecker, Vardit Ravitsky, Mohammad Ghaly, Jean-Christophe Bélisle-Pipon, Caesar Atuire

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nancy S JeckerUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5642-748X
Vardit RavitskyUniversity of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7080-8801
Mohammad GhalyHamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-5577-6525
Jean-Christophe Bélisle-PiponSimon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8965-8153
Caesar AtuireUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, England.ORCID 0000-0001-6825-6916

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper opens a critical conversation about the ethics of international bioethics conferencing and proposes principles that commit to being anti-discriminatory, global, and inclusive. We launch this conversation in the Section, Case Study, with a case example involving the International Association of Bioethics' (IAB's) selection of Qatar to host the 2024 World Congress of Bioethics. IAB's choice of Qatar sparked controversy. We believe it also may reveal deeper issues of Islamophobia in bioethics. The Section, Principles for International Bioethics Conferencing, sets forth and defends proposed principles for international bioethics conferencing. The Section, Applying Principles to Site Selection applies the proposed principles to the case example. The Section, Applying Principles Beyond Site Selection addresses other applications of the proposed principles. The Section, Objections responds to objections. We close (in the Section, Conclusion) by calling for a wider discussion of our proposed principles.

Indexed as

BioethicsEthicistsHumansEpistemic justiceglobal bioethicshuman rightsinternational bioethicsIslamophobiaRacism

Identifiers

PMID37549186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.