Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37549139›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Modulating prospective memory and attentional control with high-definition transcranial current stimulation: Study protocol of a randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled trial in healthy older adults.

Nadine Schmidt, Marta Menéndez-Granda, Ronya Münger, Thomas P Reber, Ute J Bayen, Fabian E Gümüsdagli, Alexandra Hering, Emilie Joly-Burra, Matthias Kliegel, Jessica Peter

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04882527 (Modulating Prospective Memory in Older Adults With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04882527 nacompletednot on this map

Modulating Prospective Memory in Older Adults With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BernRan2021 to 2023Enrolled106ConditionsHealthy AgingArmsNon-invasive brain stimulation, Sham stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nadine SchmidtUniversity Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3719-2814
Marta Menéndez-GrandaUniversity Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Ronya MüngerUniversity Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Thomas P ReberFaculty of Psychology, Uni Distance Suisse, Brig, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3969-9782
Ute J BayenInstitute for Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Fabian E GümüsdagliInstitute for Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Alexandra HeringDepartment of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg School for Social and Behavioural Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Emilie Joly-BurraCognitive Aging Lab (CAL), Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Matthias KliegelCognitive Aging Lab (CAL), Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jessica PeterUniversity Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to remember future intentions (i.e., prospective memory) is influenced by attentional control. At the neuronal level, frontal and parietal brain regions have been related to attentional control and prospective memory. It is debated, however, whether more or less activity in these regions is beneficial for older adults' performance. We will test that by systematically enhancing or inhibiting activity in these regions with anodal or cathodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in older adults. We will include n = 105 healthy older volunteers (60-75 years of age) in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, and parallel-group design. The participants will receive either cathodal, anodal, or sham high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the left or right inferior frontal gyrus, or the right superior parietal gyrus (1mA for 20 min). During and after stimulation, the participants will complete tasks of attentional control and prospective memory. The results of this study will clarify how frontal and parietal brain regions contribute to attentional control and prospective memory in older healthy adults. In addition, we will elucidate the relationship between attentional control and prospective memory in that age group. The study has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on the 12th of May 2021 (trial identifier: NCT04882527).

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAgedAttentionBrainDouble-Blind MethodHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID37549139
PMCPMC10406223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.