Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37549070›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2024

A Fully Differentiable Framework for 2D/3D Registration and the Projective Spatial Transformers.

Cong Gao, Anqi Feng, Xingtong Liu, Russell H Taylor, Mehran Armand, Mathias Unberath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intraoperative 2D/3D Image Registration via Differentiable X-ray Rendering.Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cong Gao
Anqi Feng
Xingtong Liu
Russell H Taylor
Mehran Armand
Mathias Unberath

Funding

Image-Guided Workstation and Tools for the Treatment of Bone DefectsR01EB016703 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI ARMAND, MEHRAN · 2013 to 2022
$3.4M
Robotic System for Spinal Decompression and Interbody FusionR01AR080315 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI ARMAND, MEHRAN, JAIN, AMIT · 2022 to 2025
$1.7M
Robot-Assisted Femoroplasty with Intraoperative Biomechanical FeedbackR01EB023939 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ARMAND, MEHRAN · 2017 to 2020
$1.6M
Task-aware and Autonomous Robotic C-arm Servoing for Flouroscopy-guided InterventionsR21EB028505 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI UNBERATH, MATHIAS · 2020 to 2022
$629k
X-Ray Image-based Biomechanical Guidance for Hip SurgeryR21EB020113 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ARMAND, MEHRAN · 2015 to 2016
$397k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR080315NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016703NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023939NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB020113NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB028505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image-based 2D/3D registration is a critical technique for fluoroscopic guided surgical interventions. Conventional intensity-based 2D/3D registration approa- ches suffer from a limited capture range due to the presence of local minima in hand-crafted image similarity functions. In this work, we aim to extend the 2D/3D registration capture range with a fully differentiable deep network framework that learns to approximate a convex-shape similarity function. The network uses a novel Projective Spatial Transformer (ProST) module that has unique differentiability with respect to 3D pose parameters, and is trained using an innovative double backward gradient-driven loss function. We compare the most popular learning-based pose regression methods in the literature and use the well-established CMAES intensity-based registration as a benchmark. We report registration pose error, target registration error (TRE) and success rate (SR) with a threshold of 10mm for mean TRE. For the pelvis anatomy, the median TRE of ProST followed by CMAES is 4.4mm with a SR of 65.6% in simulation, and 2.2mm with a SR of 73.2% in real data. The CMAES SRs without using ProST registration are 28.5% and 36.0% in simulation and real data, respectively. Our results suggest that the proposed ProST network learns a practical similarity function, which vastly extends the capture range of conventional intensity-based 2D/3D registration. We believe that the unique differentiable property of ProST has the potential to benefit related 3D medical imaging research applications. The source code is available at https://github.com/gaocong13/Projective-Spatial-Transformers.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalPelvisAlgorithmsFluoroscopySoftware

Identifiers

PMID37549070
PMCPMC10879149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.