ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
PACT: a pipeline for analysis of circulating tumor DNA.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- From imaging to omics: deep learning is bridging MRI and liquid biopsy in bone tumor diagnosis.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Review
- MobiCT: a UMI-based circulating tumor DNA analysis pipeline.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing Dataset Downloader and In Silico Sequence Mining: Graphical-User-Interface-Based Tools for Accessible, Multiprobe Target Mining in Next-Generation Sequencing Data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Integrated Multiclass Driver ctDNA Profiling Enables MPNST Detection and Monitoring in NF1 Patients.Research square · 2025Article
- MRDagent: iterative and adaptive parameter optimization for stable ctDNA-based MRD detection in heterogeneous samples.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Genomic and Epigenomic Analysis of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Identifies Stemness Features Associated with Worse Survival in Lethal Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationDetection of genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is currently used for active clinical monitoring of cancer progression and treatment response. While methods for analysis of small mutations are more developed, strategies for detecting structural variants (SVs) in ctDNA are limited. Additionally, reproducibly calling small-scale mutations, copy number alterations, and SVs in ctDNA is challenging due to the lack to unified tools for these different classes of variants.
resultsWe developed a unified pipeline for the analysis of ctDNA [Pipeline for the Analysis of ctDNA (PACT)] that accurately detects SVs and consistently outperformed similar tools when applied to simulated, cell line, and clinical data. We provide PACT in the form of a Common Workflow Language pipeline which can be run by popular workflow management systems in high-performance computing environments. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PACT is freely available at https://github.com/ChrisMaherLab/PACT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.