ArticleJournal of AOAC International2023
Consumer-Led Investigation into Potential Issues That Arise When Testing Dairy Matrixes for Gluten With the NIMA Sensor.
Article in Journal of AOAC International, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of technology to educate patients with celiac disease.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSome consumers with celiac disease use personal, point-of-use gluten detection devices to test food. False-positive results may occur due to sampling, matrix effects, and sensor issues.
objectiveThe purpose of the present study was to determine if the positive gluten results some users were obtaining when testing cream cheese and materials of similar consistency were false positives and, if so, what might be causing them to occur.
methodsCream cheese, soft cheese, and yogurt were tested for gluten using the Ridascreen Gliadin R7001 sandwich R5 ELISA and the Ridascreen Gliadin R7021 competitive R5 ELISA. Two test portions were taken, extracted, and tested from each homogenized material. Materials were also analyzed for gluten using a NIMA sensor, a personal, point-of-use gluten detection device. Multiple test portion weights were tested beginning at 0.13 to 0.17 g (the ideal weight of the test portion according to the NIMA sensor development team).
resultsUsing the sandwich R5 ELISA and the competitive R5 ELISA, all materials tested below the lower LOD for gluten. Using a NIMA sensor, as the weight of the test portion tested increased, sensor results went from no gluten found, to gluten found, to no test result.
conclusionThe gluten found results using the NIMA sensor are likely false positives that appear to correspond with the weight and volume of the material tested, as well as the viscosity. There is also an apparent disconnect between the gluten found result reported by the sensor and an interpretation of the lateral flow device (LFD) strip result when assessed by eye which should also be taken into account. Ideally, NIMA sensor users should be advised on the weight amount of material to analyze and test portions should be weighed before being used with the NIMA sensor. However, this is not a practical solution when testing in many environments, including restaurants. HIGHLIGHTS: Slight variations in weight and volume of test materials can result in false positive results when testing dairy matrixes for gluten using the Nima sensor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.