Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37548996›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2023

Assessing Mood With the Identifying Depression Early in Adolescence Chatbot (IDEABot): Development and Implementation Study.

Anna Viduani, Victor Cosenza, Helen L Fisher, Claudia Buchweitz, Jader Piccin, Rivka Pereira, Brandon A Kohrt, Valeria Mondelli, Alastair van Heerden, Ricardo Matsumura Araújo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. First-person pronouns as linguistic markers of depression among Brazilian youths.Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anna ViduaniDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6289-6397
Victor CosenzaCenter for Technological Advancement, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6981-0835
Helen L FisherSocial, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4174-2126
Claudia BuchweitzDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6213-9724
Jader PiccinDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4191-6966
Rivka PereiraDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0472-9398
Brandon A KohrtDivision of Global Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3829-4820
Valeria MondelliDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8690-6839
Alastair van HeerdenCentre for Community Based Research, Human Sciences Research Council, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2530-6885
Ricardo Matsumura Araújo *Center for Technological Advancement, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0514-8883
Christian Kieling *Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7691-4149

Funding

Brazilian-American Initiative on Neuroimaging for Identifying Depression Early in Adolescence (BRAIN-IDEA)R21MH124072 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KIELING, CHRISTIAN, SWARTZ, JOHNNA ROSE · 2020 to 2020
$346k
Medical Research Council MC_PC_MR/R019460/1NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH124072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health status assessment is mostly limited to clinical or research settings, but recent technological advances provide new opportunities for measurement using more ecological approaches. Leveraging apps already in use by individuals on their smartphones, such as chatbots, could be a useful approach to capture subjective reports of mood in the moment.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe the development and implementation of the Identifying Depression Early in Adolescence Chatbot (IDEABot), a WhatsApp-based tool designed for collecting intensive longitudinal data on adolescents' mood.

methodsThe IDEABot was developed to collect data from Brazilian adolescents via WhatsApp as part of the Identifying Depression Early in Adolescence Risk Stratified Cohort (IDEA-RiSCo) study. It supports the administration and collection of self-reported structured items or questionnaires and audio responses. The development explored WhatsApp's default features, such as emojis and recorded audio messages, and focused on scripting relevant and acceptable conversations. The IDEABot supports 5 types of interactions: textual and audio questions, administration of a version of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire, unprompted interactions, and a snooze function. Six adolescents (n=4, 67% male participants and n=2, 33% female participants) aged 16 to 18 years tested the initial version of the IDEABot and were engaged to codevelop the final version of the app. The IDEABot was subsequently used for data collection in the second- and third-year follow-ups of the IDEA-RiSCo study.

resultsThe adolescents assessed the initial version of the IDEABot as enjoyable and made suggestions for improvements that were subsequently implemented. The IDEABot's final version follows a structured script with the choice of answer based on exact text matches throughout 15 days. The implementation of the IDEABot in 2 waves of the IDEA-RiSCo sample (140 and 132 eligible adolescents in the second- and third-year follow-ups, respectively) evidenced adequate engagement indicators, with good acceptance for using the tool (113/140, 80.7% and 122/132, 92.4% for second- and third-year follow-up use, respectively), low attrition (only 1/113, 0.9% and 1/122, 0.8%, respectively, failed to engage in the protocol after initial interaction), and high compliance in terms of the proportion of responses in relation to the total number of elicited prompts (12.8, SD 3.5; 91% out of 14 possible interactions and 10.57, SD 3.4; 76% out of 14 possible interactions, respectively).

conclusionsThe IDEABot is a frugal app that leverages an existing app already in daily use by our target population. It follows a simple rule-based approach that can be easily tested and implemented in diverse settings and possibly diminishes the burden of intensive data collection for participants by repurposing WhatsApp. In this context, the IDEABot appears as an acceptable and potentially scalable tool for gathering momentary information that can enhance our understanding of mood fluctuations and development.

Indexed as

adolescentambulatory assessmentchatbotdepressiondigital mental healthmobile phonesmartphone

Identifiers

PMID37548996
PMCPMC10442728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.