Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37548906›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2023

Which is More Effective and Safer? Comparison of Propensity Score-Matched Microhook Ab Interno Trabeculotomy and iStent Inject.

Ryo Asaoka, Shunsuke Nakakura, Tsukasa Mochizuki, Akiko Ishida, Yuri Fujino, Kaori Ishii, Akira Obana, Masaki Tanito, Yoshiaki Kiuchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Visual Function After Schlemm's Canal-Based MIGS.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of 1-year effectiveness between phaco-microhook ab-interno trabeculotomy and phaco-iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent in primary open-angle glaucoma with low-teen intraocular pressure.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ryo AsaokaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Naka-Ku, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, Japan. rasaoka-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Shunsuke NakakuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Tsukasa MochizukiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Akiko IshidaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Shimane, Japan.
Yuri FujinoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Naka-Ku, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, Japan.
Kaori IshiiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Naka-Ku, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, Japan.
Akira ObanaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Naka-Ku, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, Japan.
Masaki TanitoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Shimane, Japan.
Yoshiaki KiuchiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Shimane University · JPHiroshima University · JPSeirei Hamamatsu General Hospital · JP

Funding

Ministry of Education, Science, Techonology, Sports and Cultrue of Japan 18KK0253Ministry of Education, Science, Techonology, Sports and Cultrue of Japan 19H01114Ministry of Education, Science, Techonology, Sports and Cultrue of Japan 20K09784Ministry of Education, Science, Techonology, Sports and Cultrue of Japan 20K18337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes between ab interno trabeculotomy (LOT) and iStent inject W implantation (iStent) both combined with cataract surgery, matching the background factors including age, intraocular pressure (IOP), medication score, central corneal thickness (CCT), and axial length.

methodsA total of 100 eyes from 75/79 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma were included in the LOT/iStent groups. The background factors were matched between the two groups using the propensity score.

resultsThere were no significant differences in age, IOP, medication score, CCT, and axial length, preoperatively. The postoperative medication scores were 1.3 ± 1.2 and 1.2 ± 1.2 in the LOT and iStent groups. The postoperative IOPs were 12.8 ± 2.8 and 13.1 ± 2.4 mmHg in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. The changes in the medication score were  - 0.64 ± 1.4 and  - 0.44 ± 1.6 in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. The changes in the IOP were  - 2.1 ± 3.3 and  - 1.5 ± 3.0 mmHg in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. These values were not significantly different between the two groups. The postoperative IOP and changes in the IOP were significantly associated with preoperative IOP and CCT. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications (hyphema, 11.0% and 6.0%, and transient ocular hypertension, 8.0% and 5.0%, in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively).

conclusionLOT and iStent have similar surgical outcomes with sufficient safety. Postoperative IOP was significantly associated with preoperative IOP and CCT in both groups.

Indexed as

Central corneal thickness (CCT)GlaucomaIntraocular pressure (IOP)iStentTrabeculotomy

Identifiers

PMID37548906
PMCPMC10441850
OpenAlexW4385620758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.