Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37548781›Full record

Observational studyTechniques in coloproctology2023

Clinical characterization of patients with anal fistula during follow-up of anorectal abscess: a large population-based study.

E Sanchez-Haro, E Vela, M Cleries, S Vela, I Tapiolas, J Troya, J-F Julian, D Parés

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Techniques in coloproctology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anorectal Abscess.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024
    Review
  10. Perianal Fistula; from Etiology to Treatment - A Review.Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E Sanchez-HaroSection of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol School of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, C/ Canyet S/N 08916, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
E VelaÀrea de Sistemes d'informació, Servei Català de la Salut (CatSalut), Digitalization for the Sustainability of the Healthcare System (DS3), IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.
M CleriesÀrea de Sistemes d'informació, Servei Català de la Salut (CatSalut), Digitalization for the Sustainability of the Healthcare System (DS3), IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.
S VelaSection of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol School of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, C/ Canyet S/N 08916, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
I TapiolasSection of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol School of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, C/ Canyet S/N 08916, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
J TroyaSection of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol School of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, C/ Canyet S/N 08916, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
J-F JulianSection of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol School of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, C/ Canyet S/N 08916, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
D ParésSection of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol School of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, C/ Canyet S/N 08916, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain. dapares@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8233-4888
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeApproximately 15-50% of patients with an anorectal abscess will develop an anal fistula, but the true incidence of this entity is currently unknown. The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of anorectal abscess and development of a fistula in a specific population area and to identify potential risk factors associated with demographic, socioeconomic and pre-existing disease (e.g. diabetes and inflammatory bowel disease).

methodsA longitudinal observational study was designed including a large cohort study in an area with 7,553,650 inhabitants in Spain 1st january 2014 to 31st december 2019. Adults who attended for the first time with an anorectal abscess and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. The diagnosis was made using ICD-10 codes for anorectal abscess and anal fistula.

resultsDuring the study period, we included 27,821 patients with anorectal abscess. There was a predominance of men (70%) and an overall incidence of 596 per million population. The overall incidence of anal fistula developing from abscesses was 20%, with predominance in men, and a lower incidence in the lowest income level. The cumulative incidence of fistula was higher in men and in younger patients (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, patients aged 60-69 years (hazard ratio 2.0) and those with inflammatory bowel disease (hazard ratio 1.8-2.0) had a strong association with fistula development (hazard ratio 2.0).

conclusionsOne in five patients with an anorectal abscess will develop a fistula, with a higher likelihood in men. Fistula formation was strongly associated with inflammatory bowel disease.

Indexed as

Anus DiseasesInflammatory Bowel DiseasesRectal FistulaAbscessAdultCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleAnal abscessAnal fistulaRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID37548781
PMCPMC10484809
OpenAlexW4385620897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.