ReviewActa neurochirurgica. Supplement2023
Preventing Medicolegal Problems in Neurosurgical Practice: Do's and Don'ts.
Review in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a sea change in the scenario of medical practice, manifested in a serious trust deficit between patients and doctors and an exponential rise in malpractice litigation. This has given boost to the practice of defensive medicine by doctors. Neurosurgery is considered to be a high-risk branch of surgery in terms of potential for medicolegal issues. It is inevitable that as a response to these changes, we should identify the potential problem areas and adopt measures to deal with them. Practicing ethical, rational, and evidence-based medicine can minimize medicolegal problems. It is suggested to avoid treating patients beyond one's competence. In this review, the concept of negligence is defined, and the common allegations and causes of litigation in neurosurgical practice are identified. The importance of keeping meticulous patient records in preventing medicolegal problems is emphasized. The value of obtaining informed consent and operation-specific consent is highlighted. It is advised not to overpromise the results of treatment. The roles of effective communication and display of empathy toward treated individuals are important factors in averting litigation by them. Communication failure results in breakdown of the doctor-patient relationship. The protective value of professional liability insurance to deal with potential problems is stressed. Finally, the practice of "jousting," or bad-mouthing a colleague, is strongly condemned, as it can provoke malpractice litigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37548743What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.