ReviewActa neurochirurgica. Supplement2023
Minimally Invasive Neuroendoscopic Surgery for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Review of the Rationale and Associated Complications.
Review in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness and Safety of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Infratentorial Hemorrhages: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Technical Outcomes.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2026Review
- The Application Value of Personalized 3D Printed Navigation Molds in Neurosurgery.Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Neurosurgeons' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding 3D-printed guide plate-guided puncture and drainage surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Minimally Invasive Surgery for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with a poor prognosis. Its mortality rate exceeds 40%, and 10-15% of survivors remain fully dependent. Considering the limited number of effective therapeutic options in such cases, the possibilities for surgical interventions aimed at removal of a hematoma should always be borne in mind. Although conventional surgery for deep-seated ICH has failed to show an improvement in outcomes, use of minimally invasive techniques-in particular, neuroendoscopic procedures-may be more effective and has demonstrated promising results. Although there are certain risks of morbidities (including rebleeding, epilepsy, meningitis, infection, pneumonia, and digestive tract disorders) and a nonnegligible risk of mortality, their incidence rates after neuroendoscopic evacuation of ICH compare favorably with those after conventional surgery. Prevention of complications requires careful postoperative surveillance of the patient and, preferably, treatment in a neurointensive care unit, as well as early detection and appropriate management of associated comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37548729What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.